Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla workflow

2014-01-19 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 04:10:20 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > i disagree. dev-portage@ get's cc-ed on bugs when they're being kept > abreast of developments (like PMS), or someone just wants an > opinion/feedback on an issue. so there's no way to differentiate > between bugs that are assigned to t

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla workflow

2014-01-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 14 January 2014 21:58:38 Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 15:42:48 -0800 Brian Dolbec wrote: > > 2) start working on a solution, > >a) if you have significant progress, but need more time, mark it > > accordingly, assign it to yourself, leave a comment, etc. > > Assign

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla workflow

2014-01-14 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 15:42:48 -0800 Brian Dolbec wrote: > So, a suggested workflow is: I like this workflow the most; however, feedback on it appears to be missing and the document incorporation seems to outright ignore it. Can we please (re)consider and discuss this? > 1) check a bug, > a

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla workflow

2014-01-07 Thread Sebastian Luther
Here's a new version of the workflow that tries to incorporate all the comments. This should go into the DEVELOPING file once everyone agrees. Bugzilla There always exists a tracker bug, named: "[Tracker] sys-apps/portage-". This bug is renamed from X.Y.Z to X.Y.Z+1 after a release, un

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla workflow

2014-01-05 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 18:04 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 05 January 2014 17:54:12 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > > On 05/01/14 23:30, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > > If you open the tracker bug. The bug numbers listed as blockers. > > > Hover your mouse over the bug number. A small popup windo

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla workflow

2014-01-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 05 January 2014 17:54:12 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 05/01/14 23:30, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > If you open the tracker bug. The bug numbers listed as blockers. > > Hover your mouse over the bug number. A small popup window > > appears and shows the bug summary and status. The keywords

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla workflow

2014-01-05 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/01/14 23:30, Brian Dolbec wrote: > If you open the tracker bug. The bug numbers listed as blockers. > Hover your mouse over the bug number. A small popup window > appears and shows the bug summary and status. The keywords are not > listed.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla workflow

2014-01-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 05 January 2014 17:05:04 Sebastian Luther wrote: > For now I tried to handle bugs like Zac did. That is: > > There always exists a tracker bug, named: > "[Tracker] sys-apps/portage-". would be nice to start adding an alias field. this way you can do: https://bugs.gentoo.org/sho

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla workflow

2014-01-05 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 23:19 +0100, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 05/01/14 23:05, Sebastian Luther wrote: > > I like this workflow because it makes it easy to see what has been > > fixed since the last release. The only thing I have no use for, is > > this InVCS keyword. I do not know what Zac us

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla workflow

2014-01-05 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/01/14 23:05, Sebastian Luther wrote: > I like this workflow because it makes it easy to see what has been > fixed since the last release. The only thing I have no use for, is > this InVCS keyword. I do not know what Zac used it for. Does > an

[gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla workflow

2014-01-05 Thread Sebastian Luther
Hi all, since we're at documenting things, I wonder if we want to discuss and document the bugzilla workflow. For now I tried to handle bugs like Zac did. That is: There always exists a tracker bug, named: "[Tracker] sys-apps/portage-". This bug is renamed from X.Y.Z to X.Y.Z+1 after a release,