Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] GLEP 14?
John J Lee wrote: So, is there some work that needs to be done on portage before step 3 happens -- i.e. is now the wrong time to be doing that work? Or is it just lack of somebody to do it? In short: No, yes, yes. What really is needed is sets support in portage. See bug 144480 for that. [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144480 -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-portage-dev] GLEP 14?
What's the current status of GLEP 14? This wiki page on glsa-check (which seems to have been more or less unchanged for a very long time) has a roadmap: http://gentoo-wiki.com/Glsa-check """ The implementation will take place in the following order: 1. distribute GLSAs in the portage tree (completed) 2. release a beta version of the GLSA handling code in gentoolkit (in progress) 3. move dependency handling code from emerge to portage.py 4. add glsa.py to portage 5. integrate functions from glsa-check in emerge and equery Note: This list might be expanded in the future """ So, is there some work that needs to be done on portage before step 3 happens -- i.e. is now the wrong time to be doing that work? Or is it just lack of somebody to do it? John -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
