Jason Stubbs wrote:
What if portage's dependencies aren't satisfied? Something like the below
(possibly combined with the pprovided stuff) would be better...
Silly me, I forgot that portage had dependencies. Your patch looks good. It's
sad that simple little bugs like this have been sitting f
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 19:52, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:32:26 +0900
>
> Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 October 2005 16:49, Zac Medico wrote:
> > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
> > >
> > > This simple patch automatically bumps portage
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:32:26 +0900
Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 October 2005 16:49, Zac Medico wrote:
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
> >
> > This simple patch automatically bumps portage to the top of the
> > merge list. I've always wanted this feature
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 16:49, Zac Medico wrote:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
>
> This simple patch automatically bumps portage to the top of the merge list.
> I've always wanted this feature and it is a dependency of bug 108262.
> Feedback please. :)
No good. ;)
What if po
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
This simple patch automatically bumps portage to the top of the merge list.
I've always wanted this feature and it is a dependency of bug 108262. Feedback
please. :)
Zac
Index: bin/emerge
===
