[gentoo-portage-dev] Portage rating in O'Reilly book

2005-11-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I don't know whether all of you read my blog, but I wanted to make sure
you saw this:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/spyderous/60809.html?thread=89737#t89737.
It's a reply from the author of a book on why he rated our package
management at a 4 instead of a 5, and it gives some good ideas on where
users feel things could improve.

Feel free to ignore the binary packages bit, as that's more of a Gentoo
philosophical issue.

Thanks,
Donnie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDc5riXVaO67S1rtsRAkWBAJ9QkjDsltO24UrGW9oF2WKNkAL1cACfUDRY
OcCUgni8pLJ9CMxN/Bx1fC0=
=wOGZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage rating in O'Reilly book

2005-11-10 Thread Brian
On Thu, 2005-10-11 at 11:09 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 I don't know whether all of you read my blog, but I wanted to make sure
 you saw this:
 http://www.livejournal.com/users/spyderous/60809.html?thread=89737#t89737.
 It's a reply from the author of a book on why he rated our package
 management at a 4 instead of a 5, and it gives some good ideas on where
 users feel things could improve.
 
 Feel free to ignore the binary packages bit, as that's more of a Gentoo
 philosophical issue.
 
 Thanks,
 Donnie

GUI wise, porthole-0.5.0 is much improved over previous versions.  It
runs very smooth now with hick-ups a rarity. :) All We are waiting for
now is some last minute translation updates for it's next release.

With all the changes and bug fixes I see in my mail these days, by this
time next year things will have improved a whole bunch.

Keep up the good work :)

-- 
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list