Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)

2006-03-03 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Brian Harring wrote: If y'all want to mirror it, might I suggest poking marienz for his tailorization knowledge? Afaik, he had a bzr-svn push working, or at least has investigated it. From what I've heard, tailor has absolutely no knowledge of branches. So if you use branches, might want to

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)

2006-03-02 Thread Brian Harring
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 08:15:19PM -0800, Brian wrote: On Wed, 2006-01-03 at 17:39 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: emerge bzr bzr get http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour cd saviour bzr pull ...roughly. ;) a little too rough :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ bzr get

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)

2006-03-02 Thread Michael Schilling
Hi, Brian wrote on Thursday the 2nd of March 2006: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ bzr get http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour bzr: ERROR: urllib2.HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden at /usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py line 480 in http_error_default [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ After

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)

2006-03-02 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:54:45PM +0100, Michael Schilling wrote: Hi, Brian wrote on Thursday the 2nd of March 2006: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ bzr get http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour bzr: ERROR: urllib2.HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden at

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)

2006-03-02 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Brian Harring wrote: I switched over to bzr about 2 months back; svn doesn't allow for offline committing, nor does gentoo's vcs allow for anon*... bzr natively allows for those capabilities, so that's what I'm using. :) http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour Is where I'll be

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)

2006-03-02 Thread Alec Warner
Marius Mauch wrote: Does that mean we should drop the SVN branch? Marius I've already removed it from the documentation and added links to Brian's current work on ge.org. As far as the actual repo, I think keeping it around a bit longer might be beneficial, but who knows.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)

2006-03-02 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:44:58PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: Brian Harring wrote: On 2/28/06, *Michael Schilling* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Is one of these svn-web-repository up to date? *

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)

2006-03-01 Thread Brian
On Wed, 2006-01-03 at 17:39 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: On 2/28/06, Michael Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Is one of these svn-web-repository up to date? * http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/branches/savior/ *

[gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)

2006-02-28 Thread Michael Schilling
Hello everyone, some days ago I asked about a portage API on #gentoo-portage and they pointed me to the new portage rewrite (saviour branch). Because I want to do a complete OO rewrite of my program glcu (glcu.sf.net) a OO portage API would be really useful. And I think this would be useful for