Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Speeding up Tree Verification

2020-06-30 Thread Zac Medico
On 6/30/20 10:29 AM, Sid Spry wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:34 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 6/29/20 7:15 PM, Sid Spry wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:13 PM, Sid Spry wrote: Hello, I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification algorithm. >>>

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Speeding up Tree Verification

2020-06-30 Thread Sid Spry
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:34 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 6/29/20 7:15 PM, Sid Spry wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:13 PM, Sid Spry wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification > >> algorithm. > > > > Ah, right. It's worth noting that

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Speeding up Tree Verification

2020-06-29 Thread Zac Medico
On 6/29/20 7:15 PM, Sid Spry wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:13 PM, Sid Spry wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification >> algorithm. > > Ah, right. It's worth noting that even faster than this algorithm is simply > verifying > a .tar.xz. Is

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Speeding up Tree Verification

2020-06-29 Thread Sid Spry
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:13 PM, Sid Spry wrote: > Hello, > > I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification > algorithm. Ah, right. It's worth noting that even faster than this algorithm is simply verifying a .tar.xz. Is that totally off the table? I realize it doesn't