[gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?

2006-04-10 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any trouble with them. Are there any arguments against making them default? Zac -BEGIN PGP

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?

2006-04-10 Thread Simon Stelling
Zac Medico wrote: What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any trouble with them. Are there any arguments against making them default? I didn't verify this personally, but a few days ago mkay

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?

2006-04-10 Thread Ned Ludd
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 02:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any trouble with them. Are there

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?

2006-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 10 April 2006 08:08, Ned Ludd wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 02:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any trouble with them. Are there any arguments

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?

2006-04-10 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 10 April 2006 08:08, Ned Ludd wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 02:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?

2006-04-10 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 04:28, Zac Medico wrote: Simon Stelling wrote: Zac Medico wrote: What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any trouble with them. Are there any arguments against