Going through some of the older bugs, I've started reworking emerge's depgraph
code to try and work some of them out. I've attached where I'm at (--pretend
works) but am wondering what we should do about big new patches like this. My
first instinct would be to say 2.0.55 or 2.1.0 (whatever happe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know whether all of you read my blog, but I wanted to make sure
you saw this:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/spyderous/60809.html?thread=89737#t89737.
It's a reply from the author of a book on why he rated our package
management at a 4 inste
On Thu, 2005-10-11 at 11:09 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I don't know whether all of you read my blog, but I wanted to make sure
> you saw this:
> http://www.livejournal.com/users/spyderous/60809.html?thread=89737#t89737.
> It's a reply from t
Just a quick question. With all the changes I see in this list. Is
there anything coming (that you know of) that will break porthole's use
of portage.
So far I have not experienced any real difficulties. The only hick-up I
had was reloading portage after updating to _rc7. Portage failed to
fin
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:42:54PM -0800, Brian wrote:
> Just a quick question. With all the changes I see in this list. Is
> there anything coming (that you know of) that will break porthole's use
> of portage.
Long term? I'm unfortunately looking at breaking pretty much all api
access portage
On Thu, 2005-10-11 at 20:51 -0600, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:42:54PM -0800, Brian wrote:
> > Just a quick question. With all the changes I see in this list. Is
> > there anything coming (that you know of) that will break porthole's use
> > of portage.
> Long term? I'm unf
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:29:22PM -0800, Brian wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-11 at 20:51 -0600, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:42:54PM -0800, Brian wrote:
> > > Just a quick question. With all the changes I see in this list. Is
> > > there anything coming (that you know of) that
