Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?

2006-04-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Zac Medico wrote: > Well, please file a bug then. How are we supposed to fix bugs that we aren't > aware of? :) With the portage regression test suite, of course. =) Donnie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?

2006-04-08 Thread Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 18:39 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ned Ludd wrote: > > If this has been repeated elsewhere than sorry for the re-post. > > > > The resolver still needs a bit of work before it's ready. > > > > Handling of the || () in ROOT!=

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?

2006-04-08 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 11:18 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Saturday 08 April 2006 07:36, Ned Ludd wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 14:19 -0400, solar wrote: > > > FEATURES="buildpkg" ROOT=/ emerge gcc > > > rm -rf /dev/shm/foo > > > > > > ROOT=/dev/shm/foo emerge gcc -pvK > > > > > > Notice how