-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:01:56AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
>> On Saturday 15 April 2006 03:31, Brian Harring wrote:
>>> cache backend selection (failed import == defaults to sys default)
>> This is incorrect. It displays an er
On Apr 15, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Duncan wrote:
Wouldn't the "help them out" default be consistent with the
"non-interactive" goal for portage? Quit if there's no sane way to go
forward without potentially breaking a system, but otherwise, use sane
fallbacks where they are possible.
I don't think
Hi guys,
I wonder why the default behaviour of portage is to generate ._cfg_foo
files only one time after a --sync. For example I have done the following;
- emerge --sync
- emerge baselayout --oneshot -v
._cfg_foo files are created so I can use dispatch-conf to select which one
I want t
Hey all,
I'm just wading through a list of ~200 bugs of which some need decisions what
should be done, whether it should be done at all or simply whether it is a bug
or not.
Bug: SRC_URI: spaces not supported
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102607
Is this a 'NOTABUG' case?
Bug: gpg: "str
Philipp Riegger posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
on Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:12:09 +0200:
> But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion. If i
> post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache even if i
> have FEATURES="confcache", because emerge --info d
Michiel de Bruijne posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:57:24 +0200:
> I remember vaguely that there is a setting to enable generation of
> ._cfg_foo files always, however I have searched on my system, forums
> and google, but I'm unable to find it. If actually
On Saturday 15 April 2006 18:51, Duncan wrote:
> man emerge, search on --noconfmem, or emerge --help. Both the usual
> places one looks for documentation on command line options for a Unix
> command cover it. That seems decent documentation to me, as I didn't
> remember what the option was eithe
On Saturday 15 April 2006 10:51, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Bug: SRC_URI: spaces not supported
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102607
> Is this a 'NOTABUG' case?
personally i'd say "not worth the hassle, fix the brain dead URL"
> Bug: gpg: "strict" incorrectly takes priority over "severe"
>
