Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How do we want to deal with Arfrever's bunch of patches?

On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 12:44:40 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: > On 12/12/2015 06:50 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 13:01:04 +0100 > > Alexander Berntsen wrote: > > > >> Friends, > >> > >> As I'm sure you've noticed, Arfrever pushed a bunch of

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How do we want to deal with Arfrever's bunch of patches?

On 12/13/2015 04:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> 39d81c5 portage.package.ebuild.config.config.__getitem__(): Partially drop >>> backward compatibility for nonexistent keys. >>> >>> Maybe keep it but needs someone smarter than me to review. >> >> Looks good, except the last hunk seems redundant

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How do we want to deal with Arfrever's bunch of patches?

On 12/13/2015 08:58 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 12/13/2015 04:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote: 39d81c5 portage.package.ebuild.config.config.__getitem__(): Partially drop backward compatibility for nonexistent keys. Maybe keep it but needs someone smarter than me to review. >>> >>>

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] _dep_check_composite_db._visible: verify that highest_visible matches (bug 567686)

On 12/12/2015 10:48 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > If the highest visible match for a package slot does not match the > required atom, then do not mask other packages in the same slot. > Bug 567686 was triggered when the highest visible match for the > package slot did not match the subslot specified by

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Add .git dir to excluded dirs in default PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Based off of git master at Mon Dec 14 02:36:31 UTC 2015, commit 7cbd04cd62c8f13ed41e07ff8bc9b7e5d5ac700b - - From b49fba5c16a931d3ab041446dd8aeba4d2403260 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NP-Hardass Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015