Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PROPOSAL] Don't split user visible messages across multiple lines

On 03/15/2017 03:32 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:33:28 +0200 > Alexandru Elisei wrote: > >> I was working on emerge --sync and my test repo configuration >> generated several warning messages. Finding the exact location where >> the warnings was

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge: add --autounmask-keep-keywords option (bug 622480)

On 08/13/2017 04:37 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 12/08/17 19:08, Zac Medico wrote: >> The option prevents --autounmask from making changes to >> package.accept_keywords. This option does not imply >> --autounmask-keep-masks, so --autounmask is still allowed >> to create package.unmask changes

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge: add --autounmask-keep-keywords option (bug 622480)

On 08/13/2017 05:23 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 14/08/17 01:19, Zac Medico wrote [excerpted]: >> You'll get the same result as --autounmask-use-only if you use >> --autounmask-keep-keywords together with --autounmask-keep-masks. >> >> This way, we can also add --autounmask-keep-license and >>

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] emerge: add --autounmask-keep-keywords option (bug 622480)

On 08/13/2017 07:00 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > Interesting .. I'm sure I shied away from that option for some reason > ... wonder if zmedico can shed some light on the difference between the > new options and the old, apart from some added flexibility ... The --autounmask-keep-keywords option

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge: add --autounmask-keep-keywords option (bug 622480)

On 12/08/17 19:08, Zac Medico wrote: > The option prevents --autounmask from making changes to > package.accept_keywords. This option does not imply > --autounmask-keep-masks, so --autounmask is still allowed > to create package.unmask changes unless the > --autounmask-keep-masks is also

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge: add --autounmask-keep-keywords option (bug 622480)

On 14/08/17 01:19, Zac Medico wrote [excerpted]: > You'll get the same result as --autounmask-use-only if you use > --autounmask-keep-keywords together with --autounmask-keep-masks. > > This way, we can also add --autounmask-keep-license and > --autounmask-keep-use options if we want, and the

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] emerge: add --autounmask-keep-keywords option (bug 622480)

M. J. Everitt posted on Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:37:45 +0100 as excerpted: > My use-case consists of the scenario where I do not *ever* wish Portage > to modify my /etc/portage/package. files, preferring to do > this myself manually with a personal naming scheme which defines which > target packages