Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] search functionality in emerge

2008-11-23 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 23-11-2008 a las 16:01 +0200, tvali escribió: Try esearch. emerge esearch esearch ... 2008/11/23 Emma Strubell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi everyone. My name is Emma, and I am completely new to this list. I've been using Gentoo since 2004, including Portage of

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How to hardmask all ebuilds from an overlay?

2009-02-12 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 12-02-2009 a las 10:22 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: Currently, the simplest solution might be to use an rsync command to sync the specific packages that you want (or exclude the unwanted packages) to a separate directory, and put the separate directory in PORTDIR_OVERLAY instead of the

[gentoo-portage-dev] emerge prefers to install x11-libs/qt:4 instead of ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) even when x11-libs/qt-gui:4 is already installed

2009-03-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello I have encountered this behavior with acetoneiso ebuild: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197961 the current ebuild in sunrise will fix this dropping dep on x11-libs/qt:4 but, anyway, I would want to confirm if the behavior noted in: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197961#c19

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge prefers to install x11-libs/qt:4 instead of ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) even when x11-libs/qt-gui:4 is already installed

2009-03-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 02-03-2009 a las 13:01 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: || ( ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) x11-libs/qt:4 ) It's a variation of bug 161953 [1]. For this particular variation, at the moment I don't think there's a good way to distinguish that the choice on the left is the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge prefers to install x11-libs/qt:4 instead of ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-webkit:4 ) even when x11-libs/qt-gui:4 is already installed

2009-03-03 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 03-03-2009 a las 11:25 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: You're right. It's easy to says it in words but if you tried to actually implementing you'd find that the PROPERTIES=virtual concept simplifies the problem a lot and makes it possible to optimally solve some cases of bug 141118 that

[gentoo-portage-dev] Recommendation about faster (not smaller) filesystem and blocksize combination for portage tree

2009-03-30 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello I am trying to know what filesystem+blocksize combination could be better for the kind of files stored in portage tree. In the past, I have been using reiserfs for my / partition and I had /usr/portage under it. Later, I moved /usr/portage to a different partition (distfiles go to a

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Recommendation about faster (not smaller) filesystem and blocksize combination for portage tree

2009-04-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 30-03-2009 a las 16:30 +, Duncan escribió: Pacho Ramos pa...@condmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es posted 1238412618.18113.15.ca...@localhost, excerpted below, on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:30:18 +0200: I am trying to know what filesystem+blocksize combination could be better for the kind

[gentoo-portage-dev] official way for setting per package CFLAGS and FEATURES?

2009-07-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello, I would want to always merge xorg-server, libdrm, and intel driver (that likes to crash a lot) to be always compiled with debugging symbols and FEATURES=${FEATURES} splitdebug Searching in google seems that there are some available hacks done by some forums users, but they seem to be a

[gentoo-portage-dev] Question about PDEPEND

2009-12-08 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello During today's review session with Petteri (due bug #284528) PDEPEND question appeared about what really does it. I replied that it contains dependencies that need to be installed after the package (as is shown in http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/dependencies/index.html ) but he

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Question about PDEPEND

2009-12-08 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 08-12-2009 a las 11:31 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: Pacho Ramos wrote: but he told me that PDEPEND is really the same as RDEPEND with cycle breaking. This is good description. It's handled the same as RDEPEND except when it can't due to circular dependencies. That means that it's

[gentoo-portage-dev] Is there any way to stop compilation and resume it later (after a reboot)?

2010-02-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello This is a problem I get every time openoffice needs to be recompiled :-S, it takes really a long time to do it (~10 hours) then, sometimes I need to stop compilation for halting system and, then, I need to start it again some different day. Is there any way for stopping compilation and

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Is there any way to stop compilation and resume it later (after a reboot)?

2010-02-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 19-02-2010 a las 11:09 -0500, Ghislain Bourgeois escribió: Hi, Best way I know is to use ccache and emerge --resume. But that is not exactly what you are asking for. I already use ccache and, even speeding it up, I still have to wait some hours :-( Another option could be to

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Is there any way to stop compilation and resume it later (after a reboot)?

2010-02-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 19-02-2010 a las 10:58 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: On 02/19/2010 08:44 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Another option could be to hibernate the system but, in some machines hibernation doesn't even work That might work but it's a little extreme. You might want to consider switching

[gentoo-portage-dev] Is there a way to skip tests even having FEATURES=test in make.conf?

2010-08-31 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello Let me explain my problem: I have just returned to my home and, then, I have a lot of packages to update when running emerge -avuDN world. The problem is that I have FEATURES=test enabled in my make.conf and, since some of them take years to run, I would like to temporally make portage

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Is there a way to skip tests even having FEATURES=test in make.conf?

2010-08-31 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 31-08-2010 a las 08:03 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 08/31/2010 05:14 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Hello Let me explain my problem: I have just returned to my home and, then, I have a lot of packages to update when running emerge -avuDN world. The problem is that I have

[gentoo-portage-dev] About how to make compilation think some files are missing

2011-02-12 Thread Pacho Ramos
This comes from glitz removal (bug #330397), as soon as cairo-1.10 gets stabilized, depclean will try to remove glitz, but removing glitz will break a lot of apps, needing to rebuild them and, until then, having a partially broken system. I then thought on running revdep-rebuild --library

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About how to make compilation think some files are missing

2011-02-12 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 12-02-2011 a las 18:22 +0100, Martin Doucha escribió: Dne 12.2.2011 16:50, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): Then, my idea would the following: Would be nice if I could tell portage to make compilation think libglitz-glx.so.1 is not present in real system (maybe sandbox could prevent its

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About how to make compilation think some files are missing

2011-02-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 12-02-2011 a las 15:43 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: On 02/12/2011 07:50 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: This comes from glitz removal (bug #330397), as soon as cairo-1.10 gets stabilized, depclean will try to remove glitz, but removing glitz will break a lot of apps, needing to rebuild them

[gentoo-portage-dev] How to make portage create /var/log/portage/ with portage:portage owners?

2011-11-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
I have user pacho under portage group to be able to make some tasks without becoming root, but, sadly, I am unable to make portage create /var/log/portage files/dirs with portage:portage owners instead of portage:root, preventing me from removing old files without becoming root. Is there anyway to

[gentoo-portage-dev] Is there any short syntax for REQUIRED_USE when a lot of USE flags need another one enabled?

2011-12-17 Thread Pacho Ramos
I am referring in this case to abiword, it has a plugins USE flag that enables some minimal set of plugins and, then, a lot of USE flags for building extra plugins (with extra dependencies). All of this extra plugins need plugins USE flag to be enabled. Is there any way to write a REQUIRED_USE

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue

2012-06-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 04-06-2012 a las 13:44 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 06/04/2012 04:57 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: - Looks like there is no consensus about what to do and, then, this could probably be implemented on eapi... 7? While former could probably be implemented much sooner (probably even

[gentoo-portage-dev] How to prevent dispatch-conf from reverting valid changes

2012-08-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
On every openrc update I get dispatch-conf wanting to revert all my changes in /etc/conf.d files, like KEYMAP, clock... Is there any way to prevent it from doing that? Thanks a lot for the info signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How to prevent dispatch-conf from reverting valid changes

2012-09-12 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 02-08-2012 a las 12:34 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 08/01/2012 11:36 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El mié, 01-08-2012 a las 16:14 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 08/01/2012 03:19 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: On every openrc update I get dispatch-conf wanting to revert all my changes in /etc

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Try to specify how to get that a USE flag is present in current ebuild

2012-09-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 21-09-2012 a las 12:45 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 09/21/2012 12:08 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Hello This comes from this gentoo-dev thread: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260536 In that one, we try to use the following: has vala ${IUSE//+/} ! use vala

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Try to specify how to get that a USE flag is present in current ebuild

2012-09-23 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 05:52 +, Alec Warner escribió: On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: El sáb, 22-09-2012 a las 13:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió: On Friday 21 September 2012 15:08:20 Pacho Ramos wrote: In that one, we try to use the following

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How to prevent dispatch-conf from reverting valid changes

2012-09-23 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 12-09-2012 a las 22:05 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: El jue, 02-08-2012 a las 15:56 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 08/01/2012 03:19 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: On every openrc update I get dispatch-conf wanting to revert all my changes in /etc/conf.d files, like KEYMAP, clock

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How to prevent dispatch-conf from reverting valid changes

2012-09-27 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:06 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 09/23/2012 03:59 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: This looks like could be done with: # Automerge files comprising only whitespace and/or comments # (yes or no) replace-wscomments=no , setting it to yes in dispatch-conf.conf

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How to prevent dispatch-conf from reverting valid changes

2012-09-27 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 27-09-2012 a las 13:21 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 09/27/2012 01:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:06 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 09/23/2012 03:59 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: This looks like could be done with: # Automerge files comprising only whitespace

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Try to specify how to get that a USE flag is present in current ebuild

2012-10-05 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 09:36 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 05:52 +, Alec Warner escribió: On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: El sáb, 22-09-2012 a las 13:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió: On Friday 21 September 2012 15:08:20

[gentoo-portage-dev] About adding a repoman check to test for missing files in FILESDIR

2012-10-08 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello Sometime ago this was already discussed but, if I don't misremember, it was hard to implement a check for repoman to prevent us from forgetting to commit new patches. Maybe the check could simply check if all ${FILESDIR} files are present? The idea is that it could simply check of that

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About adding a repoman check to test for missing files in FILESDIR

2012-10-08 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 08-10-2012 a las 11:32 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 10/08/2012 11:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Hello Sometime ago this was already discussed but, if I don't misremember, it was hard to implement a check for repoman to prevent us from forgetting to commit new patches. Maybe

[gentoo-portage-dev] A way to prevent useless rebuild?

2013-01-20 Thread Pacho Ramos
I noticed go USE flag was masked on gcc:4.6, the problem is that I just compiled it a week ago with USE=-go... then, I would like to know if there is a way to prevent it from being rebuild again :| (It will take some time in my currently running system but on other machines I maintain it will take

[gentoo-portage-dev] emerge @preserved-rebuild not rebuilding all broken packages after udev update

2013-02-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello For some time I am running portage-2.1.x with preserve-libs enabled to test it and try to prevent revdep-rebuild usage. Until now, I haven't had any problems with it, but I started to test it after being running udev-19x for a long time. Yesterday, my father mailed me because he got udev

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge @preserved-rebuild not rebuilding all broken packages after udev update

2013-02-20 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 19-02-2013 a las 14:27 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: On 02/19/2013 12:12 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Hello For some time I am running portage-2.1.x with preserve-libs enabled to test it and try to prevent revdep-rebuild usage. Until now, I haven't had any problems with it, but I

[gentoo-portage-dev] A way for trying to prevent useless rebuilds

2013-07-25 Thread Pacho Ramos
This question comes to my mind every time a developer decides to drop/add a USE flag to ebuilds like gcc/webkit-gtk/libreoffice... I think that we should have a file (like used for category movements) to let PM know how to handle this situation. For example, category/foo-1.0 has a gnome USE

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] A way for trying to prevent useless rebuilds

2013-07-25 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 25-07-2013 a las 12:00 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 07/25/2013 11:54 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: This question comes to my mind every time a developer decides to drop/add a USE flag to ebuilds like gcc/webkit-gtk/libreoffice... I think that we should have a file (like used

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] A way for trying to prevent useless rebuilds

2013-07-25 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 26-07-2013 a las 02:47 +0300, Alex Alexander escribió: I once half-implemented something like this but never got to finish it, I'll try to dig up my code and check out its state. I recall using updates/ to tell portage what happened, which then updated the VDB to reflect the new

Zac's status (Was: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHES] Remove --autounmask, rename --autounmask-write to --autounmask)

2013-11-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 21-11-2013 a las 10:21 +0100, Alexander Berntsen escribió: I sent this to zmedico almost two months ago, but it doesn't look like he's coming back any time soon, so I'm sending it here and ask someone to review and commit it (a role zmedico has typically played for me, as well as being

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/3] emerge: Deprecate --autounmask

2014-01-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 19-01-2014 a las 01:21 +0100, Alexander Berntsen escribió: Remove the --autounmask option from emerge. Please note that removing the option does not mean that the variable used for keeping track of autounmasking is not removed from depgraph.py. If I understand the change correctly (I

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/3] emerge: Deprecate --autounmask

2014-01-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 19-01-2014 a las 11:23 +0100, Alexander Berntsen escribió: On 19/01/14 09:01, Pacho Ramos wrote: If I understand the change correctly (I don't know much about python but, but per the diff, looks like you are dropping the option and making the code behave like it's always 'True

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: add --include-profiles=PROFILES

2019-11-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 19-11-2019 a las 00:21 +, Sergei Trofimovich escribió: > repoman slows down ~linearly with amount of profiles being scanned. > In case of amd64 we have 28 stable profiles. > > To speed up processing and fit into time budged of various CIs we can > split the work across different

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Speeding up Tree Verification

2020-06-30 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 30-06-2020 a las 08:20 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió: > Hi, > > On 29-06-2020 21:13:43 -0500, Sid Spry wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification > > algorithm. > > Before I create patches I'd like to see if there is any guidance on