like tray-icon for autosync and
notifications, also adding packages to world and removing, could be
considered; code should be build in such way that is would be possible
to add them later in different ways.
-- tvali(e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED];icq: 317-492-912)Ühe eesti
:
* Download gentoo source of Porthole
* Change that source
* Build my version of it in such way that my portage tree is OK after that
Are --fetchonly and --usepkgonly somehow related to that?
2006/3/14, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2006-14-03 at 00:39 +0200, tvali wrote:For KDE there are 2 projects
2006/3/14, Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tvali wrote: * Add package to world checking all dependencies, but not emerging * Remove package from world without unmergingUhm, why would you want that?
On my computer, building takes several hours on some packages. I have
used it in such way
resources, i will press ctrl-c, use it, then start (continue) emerge --update.
2006/3/14, tvali [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/3/14, Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tvali wrote: * Add package to world checking all dependencies, but not emerging * Remove package from world without unmergingUhm, why would
package.2006/3/14, tvali [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I did think about some priorities too, so that it could be perfect for me.
It should be possible to add package with a priority. I will give you an use case and explanation how i would use portage.
emerge --justadd kdebase-meta kicker --priority 10
emerge
some hacks in
them -- i hope that noone complains about that; normalized structures
are just dull and optimized only for dumb-user-human-readability,
which is imho not the biggest virtue of software code.
2006/3/14, tvali [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Another place, where it would be good, is that it could
want to see how *everything* relates: emerge --deep --emptytree
--pretend --tree
dcm
On 3/14/06, tvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another place, where it would be good, is that it could interact well with
GUI and it's Apply button.
Another thing, what would be imho improved
it and
use it. What is imho more important is how to make one usable
interface, which would cover both fs and sql portage db's so that
development didnt go into two products.
--
tvali
(e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
icq: 317-492-912)
Ühe eesti internetifirma lehel kohtasin tsitaati
for
that.
2006/3/14, Johannes Fahrenkrug [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tvali wrote:
I will consider what you sayd about db app design.
Anyway, i usually try to keep tables more dynamic and look at task at
hand, trying to make tables specially for it. When i tested
normalizing, i got about 60 tables where
and other such things
as last thing. And i didnt want to make pauses between emerges, but
had, because i wasnt always there, when one emerge was finished (as
they took hours).
--
tvali
(e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
icq: 317-492-912)
Ühe eesti internetifirma lehel kohtasin
assuming :)
2006/3/14, tvali [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/3/14, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Brian wrote:
On Tue, 2006-14-03 at 13:14 +0200, tvali wrote:
Ok, i was, yes, speaking about kde.
I will check out this Porthole :) I was actually thinking more about c
++, but nothing against
Ok, i think i have reasonable amount of information to start something
now :) As a last question -- what i do after some additions to
portage? Send it where?
2006/3/14, tvali [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/3/14, solar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 15:50 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
Heh
PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 03:50:18PM +0200, tvali wrote:
Another question now is about sync.
I did read somewhere, that this is not good user behavior to sync more
than once per day. I understand that as if this is a huge download
even if there is nothing changed.
Isnt it nice
Yes SQL tables are better for that as it's simpler to update them :)
2006/3/15, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:33:06PM +0200, tvali wrote:
I did think about it now and it seems to me that probably it would be
much faster if esearch is not just another package
i dont catch
everything immedietly yet :)
2006/3/16, tvali [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So I was the last one :)
My example is using python interpreter -- it's maybe simpler to use in
many cases, but theoretically slower.
It is, anyway, not so advanced to import portage, but you can add that line
)with is longer.
This is why crack is bad, mm'kay.
/me lights the pipe and goes back to his corner.
Pardon, just did a quick test and screwed the results ;)
~harring
--
tvali
(e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
icq: 317-492-912)
Ühe eesti internetifirma lehel kohtasin
Brian told that portage already has sqlite support.
Where i can find it or how i can turn it on? Is there any bugs or
other reasons to not use it? I would like to support it's code as this
is nr. 1 priority for me right now :)
--
tvali
(e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
icq: 317
]
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
--
tvali
(e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
icq: 317-492-912)
I like net more than life, cause if i do something wrong, then people
in net will tell me that i do, so that i can fix it -- people in life
will tell others that i do.
--
gentoo
to do so by hand :)
[ there are some my, Tambet's, comments near that bug in topic ]-- tvali(e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; msn:
[EMAIL PROTECTED];icq: 317-492-912)I
like net more than life, cause if i do something wrong, then people in
net will tell me that i do, so that i can fix it -- people
Many types of applications, like games, would be installed as normal user as well.
Would it have any point to make portage user-installations into user space?-- tvali(e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; msn:
[EMAIL PROTECTED];icq: 317-492-912)I
like net more than life, cause if i do something wrong
does right now with few logical commands.
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
tvali
From a programmer's point of view, the user is a peripheral that types
when you issue a read request. -P. Williams
If you think your management doesn't know what it's doing or that your
' from useflags:
UseFlags = []
2006/3/22, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3/20/06, tvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/3/20, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I do think you're overcomplicating things where you shouldn't.
Declaring stuff manually will always break
be provided as well; interface is a simple atom with few params; just test.h could be provided, also: */
#ifdef portage-providers
#provide header welcome.h
#use header someheader.h
#endif
#endif
#endif2006/3/22, tvali [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was thinking about it, too, and found something i do like
2006/3/22, Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are a few reasons why this won't work :-)First: What if I have assembler? python? perl?Your example is limited to the C preprocessor.
Yes that i did tell there that it's limited to c already :) but bin
dep, after all, is limited to lib dependencies
As an addition to code deps discussion.
I didnt understand exactly, why bin deps were supposed to be better
than what we have now, as i am not yet exactly sure what we have :)
Anyway, i see one basic plus of code deps. It's that you may have huge
number of codelines, all containing #defines and
Can someone tell me, which portage python commands should be used or
which kind of file created, if i'm going to test this idea? -- in
beginning, i would like to just add simple deps - are ebuilds the only
place to change and is there any clear doc of them [as i wouldnt like
to go through them all
On 23/03/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tvali wrote:
Can someone tell me, which portage python commands should be used or
which kind of file created, if i'm going to test this idea? -- in
beginning, i would like to just add simple deps - are ebuilds the only
place to change
>From Paul de Vrieze:The semantics that make up the relationships between useflags and the actual
source as goes out of the preprocessor is very complicated. Probably theeasiest way to find it out is to try each permutation and somehow hook intogcc/g++ to get the result of that choice.And that's
On 23/03/06, Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Certainly,chroot combined with lvm snapshots would be the easiest way.If you want to focus on binary packages, you might want to start with notdoing it automatically, but using some crude heuristics. You can make it
configurable for when the
On 23/03/06, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok... this discussion is missing my initial point that is how toprovide binary dependency and avoid many crashes we have now withalmost no effort.
Paul was not missing it ;)
Part of his message was for me, part was for you.
I have
On 24/03/06, Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 23 March 2006 21:35, tvali wrote:
BINSLOT is a new word for me.
Ok BINSLOT is normally slot. However in some cases packages are in the
same slot, but not binary compatible (like their libraries having a
different SONAME e.g
anything.
~harring
--
tvali
Measuring programming progress by lines of code is like measuring
aircraft building progress by weight. -Bill Gates
For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple,
and wrong. -H L Mencken
Theory is when you know something, but it doesn't work
On 24/03/06, Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 24 March 2006 12:40, tvali wrote:
Interface can be made somewhat automatically checkable.
For example:
void a(int);
void b(int, int);
void b(int, char);
Is compatible with:
void a(int);
void b(int, int
/%7Edavecross/Tie-Hash-Regex-1.02/lib/Tie/Hash/Regex.pm
--
tvali
Kuskilt foorumist: http://www.cooltests.com - kui inglise keelt oskad.
Muide, üle 120 oled väga tark, üle 140 oled geenius, mingi 170 oled ju mingi
täica pea nagu prügikast...
34 matches
Mail list logo
