Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support @profile package set for bug #532224

2014-12-11 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-10, o godz. 18:08:00 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Add support for a new @profile set which allows the profile to pull in additional packages that do not belong to the @system set. The motivation to have @profile separate from @system is that @system packages may

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support @profile package set for bug #532224

2014-12-11 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/11/2014 12:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-12-10, o godz. 18:08:00 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Add support for a new @profile set which allows the profile to pull in additional packages that do not belong to the @system set. The motivation to have @profile separate

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support @profile package set for bug #532224

2014-12-10 Thread viv...@gmail.com
just a typo: confgured BTW could this be used to shrink the @system set, and remove stuff like mandb for example? cheers, Francesco R.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support @profile package set for bug #532224

2014-12-10 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/10/2014 06:27 PM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: just a typo: confgured BTW could this be used to shrink the @system set, and remove stuff like mandb for example? Yes, any package with all dependencies specified is eligible for migration from @system to @profile. -- Thanks, Zac

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support @profile package set for bug #532224

2014-12-10 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Woah! This is comprehensive! Good work. I don't see anything wrong with it after reading through it. Go ahead merge, assuming your new test actually passes for you. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander