On 03/21/2018 04:30 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 21/03/18 23:26, M. J. Everitt wrote:
>> n 20/03/18 04:49, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>>> Hi Zac,
>>>
>>> alternatively could --exclude be extended to support sets?
>>> So users could --exclude @world or @profile.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Manuel
>>>
>> The idea
On 03/21/2018 05:59 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> On 22.03.2018 01:25, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 03/19/2018 09:49 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>>> Hi Zac,
>>>
>>> alternatively could --exclude be extended to support sets?
>>> So users could --exclude @world or @profile.
>>
>> Your idea doesn't really fit the
On 22.03.2018 01:25, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 03/19/2018 09:49 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>> Hi Zac,
>>
>> alternatively could --exclude be extended to support sets?
>> So users could --exclude @world or @profile.
>
> Your idea doesn't really fit the current meaning of --exclude, since
> --exclude
On 03/21/2018 04:53 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 05:49 +0100, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>> Hi Zac,
>>
>> alternatively could --exclude be extended to support sets?
>> So users could --exclude @world or @profile.
>
> Yes please, I think I have a bug in that direction already(and
On 03/19/2018 09:49 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> Hi Zac,
>
> alternatively could --exclude be extended to support sets?
> So users could --exclude @world or @profile.
Your idea doesn't really fit the current meaning of --exclude, since
--exclude excludes packages from being merged, but still adds
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 05:49 +0100, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> Hi Zac,
>
> alternatively could --exclude be extended to support sets?
> So users could --exclude @world or @profile.
Yes please, I think I have a bug in that direction already(and --exclude during
--depclean)
>
> Cheers,
> Manuel
>
>
On 21/03/18 23:26, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> n 20/03/18 04:49, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>> Hi Zac,
>>
>> alternatively could --exclude be extended to support sets?
>> So users could --exclude @world or @profile.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Manuel
>>
> The idea is sound enough, but I fear the syntax would be too
n 20/03/18 04:49, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> Hi Zac,
>
> alternatively could --exclude be extended to support sets?
> So users could --exclude @world or @profile.
>
> Cheers,
> Manuel
>
The idea is sound enough, but I fear the syntax would be too confusing.
Reading a potential command-line as "emerge
Hi Zac,
alternatively could --exclude be extended to support sets?
So users could --exclude @world or @profile.
Cheers,
Manuel
On 22.03.2018 00:03, Zac Medico wrote:
> Ignore the @world package set and its dependencies. This may be useful
> if there is a desire to perform an action even though
