Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Fixing EAPI 8 --enable-static once and for all

[Mike Gilbert]

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 3:33 AM Ulrich Mueller  wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, David Seifert wrote:
>
> > With this extensive analysis, I believe this patch to be safe.
>
> Still looks like an incompatible change, so it will need an EAPI bump.
>
> EAPI 9 feature bug is here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/815169

I support this patch to fix Portage, regardless of what PMS says.
Coding to the spec doesn't make sense if the spec is broken.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Fixing EAPI 8 --enable-static once and for all

[Michał Górny]

On Sat, 2022-11-19 at 09:33 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, David Seifert wrote:
> 
> > With this extensive analysis, I believe this patch to be safe.
> 
> Still looks like an incompatible change, so it will need an EAPI bump.
> 
> EAPI 9 feature bug is here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/815169

I dare say we've done worse retroactive changes.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Fixing EAPI 8 --enable-static once and for all

[Ulrich Mueller]

> On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, David Seifert wrote:

> With this extensive analysis, I believe this patch to be safe.

Still looks like an incompatible change, so it will need an EAPI bump.

EAPI 9 feature bug is here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/815169


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature