Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] In what phase are file "merged"?
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 9:23 PM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Fri, 06 Aug 2021, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 13:33 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 12:40 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> > I don't think that the ebuild can rely on any particular status of > >> > the new package in pkg_*rm (of the old package), or the status of > >> > the old package in pkg_*inst (of the new package). > >> > >> I would even say that it can't rely on the particular status of the > >> old package in any case, if it's meant to be removed. In particular, > >> its dependencies can be unmerged before the package itself. > > > Stubled ove this mail again and noticed "its dependencies can be > > unmerged before the package itself" stmt. That does not make sense to > > me. Deps should be unmerged after any pkg that depends on them? > > A popular workflow is "emerge -c -p" followed by "emerge -C" on entries > of the list shown. IIUC emerge -C doesn't do any dependency resolution, > therefore ebuilds cannot rely on any removal order. Not quite sure I follow. Let's assume I have A -> B -> C. Is it legal for A to call a binary packaged in A in A's pkg_prerm? If yes, then B and C have to be on the livefs at least until A's pkg_prerm has run; right?; otherwise if we unmerged B or C before then we might break A's binaries? -A > > Ulrich
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] In what phase are file "merged"?
> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 13:33 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 12:40 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> > I don't think that the ebuild can rely on any particular status of >> > the new package in pkg_*rm (of the old package), or the status of >> > the old package in pkg_*inst (of the new package). >> >> I would even say that it can't rely on the particular status of the >> old package in any case, if it's meant to be removed. In particular, >> its dependencies can be unmerged before the package itself. > Stubled ove this mail again and noticed "its dependencies can be > unmerged before the package itself" stmt. That does not make sense to > me. Deps should be unmerged after any pkg that depends on them? A popular workflow is "emerge -c -p" followed by "emerge -C" on entries of the list shown. IIUC emerge -C doesn't do any dependency resolution, therefore ebuilds cannot rely on any removal order. Ulrich signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] In what phase are file "merged"?
On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 13:33 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 12:40 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > > > On 23-06-2021 08:47:58 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > It's somewhat hidden, but it's there: > > > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprojects.gentoo.org%2Fpms%2F8%2Fpms.html%23x1-950009.1.10data=04%7C01%7CJoakim.Tjernlund%40infinera.com%7Cba02686be6d54ea9cc9108d9363acdd2%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C1%7C637600448462073359%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000sdata=Jb60QbNzyIAUesXa9Z9YVlaGbbKBVVXK6qK%2BgiZ87%2BM%3Dreserved=0 > > > > > > > > 9.1.10 pkg_preinst > > > > ... immediately before merging the package to the live > > > > filesystem. > > > > ... > > > > > > > > 9.1.11 pkg_postinst > > > > ... immediately after merging the package to the live filesystem. > > > > ... > > > > > Aha, so does this mean pkg_prerm and pkg_postrm are run with > > > replacing > > > package in place, e.g. if they refer to scripts installed by the > > > replaced package they may no longer exist or be the same? > > > > PMS has similar wording for pkg_prerm and pkg_postrm, so (at least > > according to the spec) the old package will still be present in > > pkg_prerm and will be gone in pkg_postrm. > > > > I don't think that the ebuild can rely on any particular status of > > the > > new package in pkg_*rm (of the old package), or the status of the old > > package in pkg_*inst (of the new package). > > I would even say that it can't rely on the particular status of the old > package in any case, if it's meant to be removed. In particular, its > dependencies can be unmerged before the package itself. Stubled ove this mail again and noticed "its dependencies can be unmerged before the package itself" stmt. That does not make sense to me. Deps should be unmerged after any pkg that depends on them? Jocke
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] In what phase are file "merged"?
On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 12:40 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > On 23-06-2021 08:47:58 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > It's somewhat hidden, but it's there: > > > https://projects.gentoo.org/pms/8/pms.html#x1-950009.1.10 > > > > > > 9.1.10 pkg_preinst > > > ... immediately before merging the package to the live filesystem. > > > ... > > > > > > 9.1.11 pkg_postinst > > > ... immediately after merging the package to the live filesystem. > > > ... > > > Aha, so does this mean pkg_prerm and pkg_postrm are run with > > replacing > > package in place, e.g. if they refer to scripts installed by the > > replaced package they may no longer exist or be the same? > > PMS has similar wording for pkg_prerm and pkg_postrm, so (at least > according to the spec) the old package will still be present in > pkg_prerm and will be gone in pkg_postrm. > > I don't think that the ebuild can rely on any particular status of the > new package in pkg_*rm (of the old package), or the status of the old > package in pkg_*inst (of the new package). I would even say that it can't rely on the particular status of the old package in any case, if it's meant to be removed. In particular, its dependencies can be unmerged before the package itself. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] In what phase are file "merged"?
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 23-06-2021 08:47:58 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> It's somewhat hidden, but it's there: >> https://projects.gentoo.org/pms/8/pms.html#x1-950009.1.10 >> >> 9.1.10 pkg_preinst >> ... immediately before merging the package to the live filesystem. ... >> >> 9.1.11 pkg_postinst >> ... immediately after merging the package to the live filesystem. ... > Aha, so does this mean pkg_prerm and pkg_postrm are run with replacing > package in place, e.g. if they refer to scripts installed by the > replaced package they may no longer exist or be the same? PMS has similar wording for pkg_prerm and pkg_postrm, so (at least according to the spec) the old package will still be present in pkg_prerm and will be gone in pkg_postrm. I don't think that the ebuild can rely on any particular status of the new package in pkg_*rm (of the old package), or the status of the old package in pkg_*inst (of the new package). Ulrich signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] In what phase are file "merged"?
On 23-06-2021 08:47:58 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > In PMS 9.2 is says: > > The call order for upgrading, downgrading or reinstalling a package is: > > > pkg_pretend (only for EAPIs listed in table 9.2), which is called > > outside of the normal call order process. > > pkg_setup > > src_unpack > > src_prepare (only for EAPIs listed in table 9.3) > > src_configure (only for EAPIs listed in table 9.4) > > src_compile > > src_test (except if RESTRICT=test) > > src_install > > pkg_preinst > > pkg_prerm for the package being replaced > > pkg_postrm for the package being replaced > > pkg_postinst > > > It does not say where in this list new files merged and old files > > unmerged, can anyone enlighten me? > > It's somewhat hidden, but it's there: > https://projects.gentoo.org/pms/8/pms.html#x1-950009.1.10 > >9.1.10 pkg_preinst >... immediately before merging the package to the live filesystem. ... > >9.1.11 pkg_postinst >... immediately after merging the package to the live filesystem. ... Aha, so does this mean pkg_prerm and pkg_postrm are run with replacing package in place, e.g. if they refer to scripts installed by the replaced package they may no longer exist or be the same? Thanks, Fabian -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] In what phase are file "merged"?
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > In PMS 9.2 is says: > The call order for upgrading, downgrading or reinstalling a package is: > pkg_pretend (only for EAPIs listed in table 9.2), which is called outside > of the normal call order process. > pkg_setup > src_unpack > src_prepare (only for EAPIs listed in table 9.3) > src_configure (only for EAPIs listed in table 9.4) > src_compile > src_test (except if RESTRICT=test) > src_install > pkg_preinst > pkg_prerm for the package being replaced > pkg_postrm for the package being replaced > pkg_postinst > It does not say where in this list new files merged and old files > unmerged, can anyone enlighten me? It's somewhat hidden, but it's there: https://projects.gentoo.org/pms/8/pms.html#x1-950009.1.10 9.1.10 pkg_preinst ... immediately before merging the package to the live filesystem. ... 9.1.11 pkg_postinst ... immediately after merging the package to the live filesystem. ... Ulrich signature.asc Description: PGP signature
