Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 23 January 2006 15:55, Simon Stelling wrote:
Lares Moreau wrote:
Many ebuilds fail due to failed QA. How difficult would it be to have
the package create the tarball before the QA tests. If this were
possible, QA could be slightly quicker, as there
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:43, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Indeed, could someone shade a light on what happen to /var/db/pkg and
world file when using ebuild this manner ?
Could be rephrased as Does it act exactly the same way emerge does ?
the 'qmerge' step would take care of updating
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:19, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:43, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Indeed, could someone shade a light on what happen to /var/db/pkg and
world file when using ebuild this manner ?
Could be rephrased as Does it act exactly the same way emerge
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:19:22 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:43, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Indeed, could someone shade a light on what happen to /var/db/pkg
and world file when using ebuild this manner ?
Could be rephrased as Does it act exactly the
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:19, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:43, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Indeed, could someone shade a light on what happen to /var/db/pkg and
world file when using ebuild this manner ?
Could be rephrased as Does it act
On Monday 23 January 2006 15:55, Simon Stelling wrote:
Lares Moreau wrote:
Many ebuilds fail due to failed QA. How difficult would it be to have
the package create the tarball before the QA tests. If this were
possible, QA could be slightly quicker, as there would be no need to
rebuild
