Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] first pass at --debug-build

2006-01-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 19 January 2006 19:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
 here's what i was talking about when i mentioned the mutate() idea

 tested and it works for me ... binary is built properly and environment.bz2
 contains the correct values

to speed this along ... how do people care about the FEATURES=debug-build idea 
in general ?  i could commit the first part which implements 
FEATURES=debug-build in general and then we can fight over how to implement 
`emerge --debug-build`
-mike
-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] first pass at --debug-build

2006-01-23 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Mike Frysinger wrote:
 On Thursday 19 January 2006 19:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
 
here's what i was talking about when i mentioned the mutate() idea

tested and it works for me ... binary is built properly and environment.bz2
contains the correct values
 
 
 to speed this along ... how do people care about the FEATURES=debug-build 
 idea 
 in general ?  i could commit the first part which implements 
 FEATURES=debug-build in general and then we can fight over how to implement 
 `emerge --debug-build`
 -mike

I'm stuck on this.  Part of me wants to see more new features in portage
and part of me screams horrible hack :P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=SwCk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] first pass at --debug-build

2006-01-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 23 January 2006 19:31, Alec Warner wrote:
 I'm stuck on this.  Part of me wants to see more new features in portage
 and part of me screams horrible hack :P

the idea or the implementation ?

there is no getting around the idea and forcing the users to do this stuff for 
every package is bad design
-mike
-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list