Andrew Farmer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:05:34PM -0700, Klaus D. Neumann muttered:
>
>>Hi,
>>How can I give a normal user permission to mount my M$ partition? I
>>added this line:
>>/dev/hda1/Windowsvfatuser0 0
>>to my /etc/fstab, but when I try to mount i
Roman v.Gemmeren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 00:56:35 +0100, you (Peter Ruskin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
>
>
>>Grub's (hd1,0) is /dev/hdb1, which you don't appear to have.
>>For /dev/hdd1, use (hd3,0).
>>
>>Peter
>
> Are you sure?
No, he is wrong
> when i hit Tab (after (hd
Scharf Yuval wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I'm trying to read the CD's that I've just burned the CD-RWs LED just
> blinks for a long time and after that if I try to mount I get:
> /dev/cdroms/cdrom1: Input/output error
> mount: I could not determine the filesystem type, and none was specified
>
some
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
>
> Hello,
> yes, you are right, that's needed :-) I think, this was meant by
> "...i run opengl config i change to nvidia gl...", but I could be wrong about
> that. Good point you mentioned this.
>
Look at your XF86Config, you probably didn't enable the glx exten
gabor wrote:
> start this:
>
> python -c 'int(10.1); int(1.3); int(1.2)'
>
> on a 'normal' computer, it ends without any output.
>
> on the miscompiled pentium4 computers it ends with an overflow error.
>
> so basically if it ends with overflow error, gcc broke python because of
> the march
gabor wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 12:19, Nicolas STURMEL wrote:
>
>>Adam Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>>im using gcc 3.2.3 and i was woundering if it was still going to brake every
>>>thing if i use -march=pentium4?
>>>
>>
>>I use it, and i d
Adam Dunstan wrote:
> im using gcc 3.2.3 and i was woundering if it was still going to brake every
> thing if i use -march=pentium4?
>
I use it, and i don't have any problem.
i have a celeron 2Ghz ( @ 2,7Ghz :-) )
my flags :
CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fomit-frame-point
Tom Hosiawa wrote:
> I've looked around for a solution but can't find much as to this
> particular case. I can enable dma with the linux-2.4.20-gentoo-r6 kernel
> but not with linux-2.4.21 (uses same config file), any ideas?
>
You should look previous subjets on the lists were DMA enabling is
lar
thanks a lot, that was exactly waht I was expecting :-)
--
Nicolas
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Ian Truelsen wrote:
>
> Probably the only way to get significantly better performance is by
> going to SCSI.
>
IDE RAID could also be a ( cheaper ) solution.
--
Nicolas
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Rex Young wrote:
> I think that you're stuck on the 33MHz. Don't be. I believe that they all
> operate
> at 33MHz where they are UDMA 100, UDMA 133, etc. 33MHz is the speed that
> this bus
> operates at.
I think you are wrong too :-P
The size of the IDE bus ( 16 bits ) didn't change since quit
Scharf Yuval wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't understand your answer Nicolas.
> Because My bus is 33MHz I get 27MB/s. I understand that.
> What I'm asking is if the UDMA(100) means that the HD is capable of
> 100MB/s and the bus holds it back. Does it mean that with a newer
> motherboard my HD will wor
Scharf Yuval wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone explain to me the following log messages from the kernel:
>
> ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
> ICH2: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev f9
> ICH2: chipset revision 2
> ICH2: not 100% native mode: will probe ir
Pupeno wrote:
> So, what may be wrong then ? (I didn't enable anything on the HDs yet)
>
Perhaps did you mis-config your kernel.
Look in IDE/ATAPI options to see if you enabled the driver corresponding
to your chipset.
--
Nicolas
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Yuri Enshin wrote:
> For intel SATA controller most MB's can be configured for
> 'comaptibility' (not native) mode. In this mode, you can use one PATA
> port and two SATA (as primary and slave), and this mode comaptible with
> old drivers in kernel 2.4.x. On my comp (i865-based MB and Maxtor 120GB
Ewald Geschwinde wrote:
> Do you have an url of this debian system and how they managed to get
> debian down like this
>
Not at all, i only know that they spent much time to manage this.
Did you compress your 140Mb system ? the good idea is to put a
system.tgz on the flash witch is untared on a
Ewald Geschwinde wrote:
> I need it for a embedded system.
> Should run on a flash rom with 128 MB
>
I know people who managed to put a debian system on a 128 Mb flash for
an embedded system running an Epia 5000.
But this kind of operations are tricky. Perhaps you should look in
http://www.linux.
brett holcomb wrote:
> Stage 1 tarball installs enough to get things rolling so a system can be
> built. Then it builds the system optimized for your computer. It takes
> a while but works well.
>
But what is the différence with the Stage 3 since all is re-built during
updates ?
--
Nicolas
Michael Gruetzner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a Pentium4 mPGA478 and I'd like to enable hyperthreading. The
> output of dmesg tells me, that hyperthreading is disabled and smp
> motherboard not found. My motherboard is a Fujitsu-Siemens D1527 with
> hyperthreading support. According to /proc/cpui
19 matches
Mail list logo
