-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On August 22, 2003 10:54 am, Brian Richardson wrote:
My GPG signature has just showed up as bad in KMail (It worked
yesterday...). I've done a world update since then. Is my signature bad?
Or is something else to blame?
That was strange. It's
My GPG signature has just showed up as bad in KMail (It worked yesterday...).
I've done a world update since then. Is my signature bad? Or is something
else to blame?
Regards,
Brian
--
My CODE of ETHICS is vacationing at famed SCHROON LAKE in upstate New York!!
[Public key available at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 22 August 2003 17:54, Brian Richardson wrote:
My GPG signature has just showed up as bad in KMail (It worked
yesterday...). I've done a world update since then. Is my signature bad? Or
is something else to blame?
Your signature shows as
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 11:54, Brian Richardson wrote:
My GPG signature has just showed up as bad in KMail (It worked yesterday...).
I've done a world update since then. Is my signature bad? Or is something
else to blame?
Looks fine here.
---
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.2
On August 22, 2003 10:54 am, Brian Richardson wrote:
My GPG signature has just showed up as bad in KMail (It worked
yesterday...). I've done a world update since then. Is my signature bad? Or
is something else to blame?
That was strange. It's showing as good now.
Regards,
Brian
--
All