Re: [gentoo-user] GPG signature bad?

2003-08-23 Thread Christian Bartels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On August 22, 2003 10:54 am, Brian Richardson wrote: My GPG signature has just showed up as bad in KMail (It worked yesterday...). I've done a world update since then. Is my signature bad? Or is something else to blame? That was strange. It's

[gentoo-user] GPG signature bad?

2003-08-22 Thread Brian Richardson
My GPG signature has just showed up as bad in KMail (It worked yesterday...). I've done a world update since then. Is my signature bad? Or is something else to blame? Regards, Brian -- My CODE of ETHICS is vacationing at famed SCHROON LAKE in upstate New York!! [Public key available at

Re: [gentoo-user] GPG signature bad?

2003-08-22 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 22 August 2003 17:54, Brian Richardson wrote: My GPG signature has just showed up as bad in KMail (It worked yesterday...). I've done a world update since then. Is my signature bad? Or is something else to blame? Your signature shows as

Re: [gentoo-user] GPG signature bad?

2003-08-22 Thread Alec Berryman
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 11:54, Brian Richardson wrote: My GPG signature has just showed up as bad in KMail (It worked yesterday...). I've done a world update since then. Is my signature bad? Or is something else to blame? Looks fine here. --- gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.2

Re: [gentoo-user] GPG signature bad?

2003-08-22 Thread Brian Richardson
On August 22, 2003 10:54 am, Brian Richardson wrote: My GPG signature has just showed up as bad in KMail (It worked yesterday...). I've done a world update since then. Is my signature bad? Or is something else to blame? That was strange. It's showing as good now. Regards, Brian -- All