Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome 2.2.1 Window Manager Choice

2003-03-31 Thread Spider
begin quote On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 18:17:56 +0100 (BST) "Dhruba Bandopadhyay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > In /usr/portage/gnome-base/gnome/gnome-2.2.1.ebuild on line 22 it > says: > > # Metacity was choosen as the default window manager because of > # sawfish's > long time of non-worki

Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome 2.2.1 Window Manager Choice

2003-03-30 Thread Sebastian Hungerecker
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 18:17:56 +0100 (BST) "Dhruba Bandopadhyay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > which window manager would you recommend that I should go with? I realy don't like metacity, because it's lacking a lot of features. I'd recommend xfwm4 or sawfish. Also waimea works great with gnome. -- [

[gentoo-user] Gnome 2.2.1 Window Manager Choice

2003-03-30 Thread Dhruba Bandopadhyay
Hello, In /usr/portage/gnome-base/gnome/gnome-2.2.1.ebuild on line 22 it says: # Metacity was choosen as the default window manager because of sawfish's long time of non-working state. and on lines 93-95 it says: "note that to change windowmanager to metacity do: " " export WINDOW_MANAGER=\"/us