Has anybody tried building their Gentoo (~x86) system using NPTL, PIC
and SMP? I have a hyperthreaded P4 3.06 system and I run it using an
SMP (2.6.1) kernel. I rebuilt my system using NPTL and PIC and at first
things would go very quickly. However, every time I have tried this, at
some
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:25:34AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Has anybody tried building their Gentoo (~x86) system using NPTL, PIC
and SMP?
Yes.
I have a hyperthreaded P4 3.06 system and I run it using an SMP
(2.6.1) kernel.
I also have an HT P4.
I rebuilt my system using NPTL
- -Original Message-
- From: Norberto Bensa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sent: 02 February 2004 22:54
-
- Andrew Farmer wrote:
- Well, if it's so secret, why are you sending it to a
- public mailing list?
- It looks sort of silly, you know, to have a disclaimer
- longer than the
-
Hi All
I have been running the 2.6.x kernels for sometime now.
I decided to give nptl a try.
The machine is a P3 933 with 256Mb RAM running mm-sources(2.6.1)
I emerged linux-headers... and then emerge glibc but I get an Error stating
from memory
You have the nptl use flag set but your kernel or
- -Original Message-
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sent: 02 February 2004 20:14
-
snip disclaimer /
WTF can do about company policy ???
It's not like I add the disclaimer to everyone of my mails.
anyways thanks for the help.
Wayne
--
This message may
are you using ~x86. also, what version of glibc did you compile?
Wayne Oliver wrote:
Hi All
I have been running the 2.6.x kernels for sometime now.
I decided to give nptl a try.
The machine is a P3 933 with 256Mb RAM running mm-sources(2.6.1)
I emerged linux-headers... and then emerge glibc
Hi;
When it is corporate policy to append legal stuff to outgoing email
messages, it is then appropriate to use a personal email account (such as
myway, yahoo, etc) for mailing list subscriptions rather than using a
corporate email account.
Hope this helps,
Ken Wolcott
On Monday 02
On Dec 30, 2003, at 7:17 AM, Craig Cavanaugh wrote:
I use a couple of precompiled applications that refuse to function
with NPTL compiled into glibc. Are there any tricks / environment
settings to work around the problem while still having NPTL compiled
in? Most of the applications are
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 03:16, jkw wrote:
On Dec 30, 2003, at 7:17 AM, Craig Cavanaugh wrote:
I use a couple of precompiled applications that refuse to function
with NPTL compiled into glibc. Are there any tricks / environment
settings to work around the problem while still having NPTL
I use a couple of precompiled applications that refuse to function with NPTL compiled into glibc. Are there any tricks / environment settings to work around the problem while still having NPTL compiled in? Most of the applications are closed source engineering applications and it looks like it
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:13:53AM -0500, Jerry McBride wrote:
On Sunday 14 December 2003 10:07 pm, N. Owen Gunden wrote:
As I understand it, here's what I need to do:
- Install kernel 2.6.0-test11
- Set the nptl USE flag
- emerge glibc (2.3.2 ok?)
- emerge wine
I read somewhere
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:38:18AM -0500, N. Owen Gunden wrote:
I followed this procedure, but it hasn't been working out. Problems I'm
experiencing now include:
- The nvidia kernel module doesn't work (freezes during initialization)
- wine segfaults
- mplayer segfaults
Note that I did
Owen,
Out of curiosity, is GLX still operational with NPTL enabled. I completely rebuild my system from scratch without NPTL in order to get operational. The source of the problem may have been elsewhere, but I believe that there is a warning in the glibc ebuild saying that GLX will not
N. Owen Gunden wrote:
Well, I finally found the answer to my problems. I needed to
re-emerge nvidia-glx (that's right--nvidia-glx, *not*
nvidia-kernel!). mplayer works, wine works, xmms works.
Though I'm not overly impressed with wine's performance. It's slower
than it was on 2.4 without
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:52:49AM -0500, Craig Cavanaugh wrote:
Out of curiosity, is GLX still operational with NPTL enabled. I
completely rebuild my system from scratch without NPTL in order to get
operational. The source of the problem may have been elsewhere, but I
believe that there is
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 03:30, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Monday 15 December 2003 12:07, N. Owen Gunden wrote:
I'd like to start using NPTL for at least wine, with hopes of seeing
performance enhancement.
As I understand it, here's what I need to do:
- Install kernel 2.6.0-test11
- Set
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:52:56AM +, Tom Wesley wrote:
This method worked for me perfectly over the weekend, although I
re-emerged everything as I changed my cflags too...
Are you using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86? Can you tell me your exact
versions of glibc, gcc, and kernel?
Thanks,
Owen
--
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 08:11, N. Owen Gunden wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:52:56AM +, Tom Wesley wrote:
This method worked for me perfectly over the weekend, although I
re-emerged everything as I changed my cflags too...
Are you using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86? Can you tell me your
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:30:18AM +, Tom Wesley wrote:
* sys-libs/glibc
Latest version available: 2.3.3_pre20031212
Latest version installed: 2.3.2-r9
* sys-devel/gcc
Latest version available: 3.3.2-r4
Latest version installed: 3.3.2-r3
*
On Sunday 14 December 2003 10:07 pm, N. Owen Gunden wrote:
I'd like to start using NPTL for at least wine, with hopes of seeing
performance enhancement.
As I understand it, here's what I need to do:
- Install kernel 2.6.0-test11
- Set the nptl USE flag
- emerge glibc (2.3.2 ok?)
- emerge
N. Owen Gunden wrote:
I followed this procedure, but it hasn't been working out. Problems
I'm experiencing now include:
- The nvidia kernel module doesn't work (freezes during
initialization)
- wine segfaults
- mplayer segfaults
Note that I did these things carefully with testing
I'd like to start using NPTL for at least wine, with hopes of seeing
performance enhancement.
As I understand it, here's what I need to do:
- Install kernel 2.6.0-test11
- Set the nptl USE flag
- emerge glibc (2.3.2 ok?)
- emerge wine
I read somewhere that I should use GCC 3.3 (I'm using
On Monday 15 December 2003 12:07, N. Owen Gunden wrote:
I'd like to start using NPTL for at least wine, with hopes of seeing
performance enhancement.
As I understand it, here's what I need to do:
- Install kernel 2.6.0-test11
- Set the nptl USE flag
- emerge glibc (2.3.2 ok?)
- emerge
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:07:15PM -0500, N. Owen Gunden wrote:
As I understand it, here's what I need to do:
- Install kernel 2.6.0-test11
- Set the nptl USE flag
- emerge glibc (2.3.2 ok?)
- emerge wine
I followed this procedure, but it hasn't been working out. Problems I'm
experiencing
On Monday 15 December 2003 15:38, N. Owen Gunden wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:07:15PM -0500, N. Owen Gunden wrote:
As I understand it, here's what I need to do:
- Install kernel 2.6.0-test11
- Set the nptl USE flag
- emerge glibc (2.3.2 ok?)
- emerge wine
I followed this
it yet.
-Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Scharf Yuval [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gentoo-user] NPTL documentation
Hello,
After installing NPTL, i.e. emerging glibc with USE=nptl I don't have
the man pages
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gentoo-user] NPTL documentation
Hello,
After installing NPTL, i.e. emerging glibc with USE=nptl I don't have
the man pages of the pthread_* calls.
So I'm looking for documentation of NPTL. I've
Hello,
After installing NPTL, i.e. emerging glibc with USE=nptl I don't have
the man pages of the pthread_* calls.
So I'm looking for documentation of NPTL. I've searched the Internet but
didn't find. Can some one tell me where I'll find the data I'm looking
for?
Thanks,
Yuval Scharf
--
I've just upgraded my first laptop with a newer glibc sporting both the nptl
and pic USE switches.
Thought I'd share what I've learned so far...
If you haven't noticed, this is Gentoo and so far things feel marginally
better as far as performance goes. Everything runs as before, perhaps just
Jerry McBride wrote:
I've just upgraded my first laptop with a newer glibc sporting both the nptl
and pic USE switches.
Thought I'd share what I've learned so far...
If you haven't noticed, this is Gentoo and so far things feel marginally
better as far as performance goes. Everything runs as
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 08:02 am, Javier Villavicencio wrote:
---snip---
About mysql, this is because the way the configure script looks for
threads, it checks for the word Linuxthreads inside pthread.h (wtf!) so, if
you add this to the .h you'll get mysql to compile -and work- fine with
Jason Stubbs wrote, On 10/15/2003 04:09 AM
There are several glibc versions that are hard-masked but the latest straight
~x86 version contains working nptl. I believe the hard-masked contains later
versions of nptl that have been shown to have serious bugs. The latest ~x86
version of glibc
Hi All,
I would like to try out the NPTL thread package with Gentoo, but I have
some questions :-
1. Anyone know of a NPTL FAQ ?
2. From the forums, it looks like I need 2.5 or 2.6 kernel. Is this
right ? I thought redhat 9 was using 2.4 with NPTL
3. I also use a couple of other
begin quote
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 09:46:00 +0100
Peter Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to try out the NPTL thread package with Gentoo, but I
have
some questions :-
1. Anyone know of a NPTL FAQ ?
I think google has a few...
2. From the forums, it looks like I
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 02:34, Spider wrote:
begin quote
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 09:46:00 +0100
Peter Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to try out the NPTL thread package with Gentoo, but I
have
some questions :-
2. From the forums, it looks like I need 2.5
I installed a minimal GENTOO system (no X, etc.) with
USE=nptl -X -gtk -gnome -alsa
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86
starting from stage1 and installed the Linux 2.5.74-mm1 kernel.
So far, so good.
A phenomenon I experience quite often is that the IO-Wait value in
top goes up to 99% and
36 matches
Mail list logo
