Re: [gentoo-user] The age old (CFLAGS) question..

2003-07-03 Thread Owen Gunden
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:47:49PM +, drewbian wrote: > Most certainly, I had mentioned in my origional email as the basis for > my confusion as it contains a number of conflicting posts. Sorry about that--I only caught the tail end of the thread. Owen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] The age old (CFLAGS) question..

2003-07-03 Thread drewbian
Owen Gunden wrote: Did you read this yet? http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=5717&highlight=cflags+central Most certainly, I had mentioned in my origional email as the basis for my confusion as it contains a number of conflicting posts. but thank you -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing li

Re: [gentoo-user] The age old (CFLAGS) question..

2003-07-03 Thread Owen Gunden
Did you read this yet? http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=5717&highlight=cflags+central -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] The age old (CFLAGS) question..

2003-07-03 Thread Eric Ball
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 07:14 pm, Robin H.Johnson wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > For your list of CFLAGS there, I'd advise you to read what the gcc > manpage has on them. Some of them are ok, but solely due the following > ones, I personally as a developer wouldn't support your bugs until you > recompil

Re: [gentoo-user] The age old (CFLAGS) question..

2003-07-03 Thread Sami Näätänen
On Thursday 03 July 2003 06:50, drewbian wrote: > On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 18:28, Eric Ball wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:42 pm, drewbian wrote to gentoo-user: > > > > After looking through the huge array of optimizations people > > > > have posted on the discussion forum's I'm rather confused as t

Re: [gentoo-user] The age old (CFLAGS) question..

2003-07-03 Thread Robin H . Johnson
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:28:33PM +1000, Eric Ball wrote: > CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe -mcpu=athlon-xp -m3dnow -mmmx -msse > -mfpmath=sse,387 -finline-functions -fmerge-all-constants -fthread-jumps > -fomit-frame-pointer -fexpensive-optimizations -ffast-math -fforce-addr > -falign-funct

Re: [gentoo-user] The age old (CFLAGS) question..

2003-07-03 Thread Chris I
On 2003.07.03 04:28, Eric Ball wrote: My CFLAGS for an Athlon XP 1800+ are: CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe -mcpu=athlon-xp -m3dnow -mmmx - msse -mfpmath=sse,387 -finline-functions -fmerge-all-constants -fthread-jumps -fomit-frame-pointer -fexpensive-optimizations -ffast-math -fforce-addr -fali

Re: [gentoo-user] The age old (CFLAGS) question..

2003-07-03 Thread drewbian
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 18:28, Eric Ball wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:42 pm, drewbian wrote to gentoo-user: > > > > After looking through the huge array of optimizations people have posted > > > on the discussion forum's I'm rather confused as to what the hey to put > > > in there. Particularly as

Re: [gentoo-user] The age old (CFLAGS) question..

2003-07-03 Thread Eric Ball
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:42 pm, drewbian wrote to gentoo-user: > > After looking through the huge array of optimizations people have posted > > on the discussion forum's I'm rather confused as to what the hey to put > > in there. Particularly as most posters seem to use Pent 4's or Athlon > > XP's, >

Re: [gentoo-user] The age old (CFLAGS) question..

2003-07-03 Thread drewbian
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 17:42, MAL wrote: > drewbian wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Any one here have a nice stable yet fast CFLAGS=" " section suitable for > > a duron 1.3ghz they could possibly paste? (pretty big ask I know ;)) > > CFLAGS="-march=athlon -O3 -pipe" > ... is safe and fast. > Don't forg

Re: [gentoo-user] The age old (CFLAGS) question..

2003-07-03 Thread drewbian
sorry I should have had a more descriptive subject.. Hi all, > > Any one here have a nice stable yet fast CFLAGS=" " section suitable for > a duron 1.3ghz they could possibly paste? (pretty big ask I know ;)) > > After looking through the huge array of optimizations people have posted > on the di