[gentoo-user] USB mass storage help

2005-04-05 Thread David D. Rea
Hi All- I'm trying to get my new Canon 20D to talk to my Gentoo box, but so far no luck getting the mass storage device driver to see it: 1) `dmesg` reports the following when plugging in camera: usb 1-5: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 63 Normally the usb-storage driver

Re: [gentoo-user] USB mass storage help

2005-04-05 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 06:39:46 -0400, David D. Rea wrote: I'm trying to get my new Canon 20D to talk to my Gentoo box, but so far no luck getting the mass storage device driver to see it: The Canon 300D and A75 don't present themselves as mass storage devices, so I doubt the 20D does either. You

Re: [gentoo-user] USB mass storage help

2005-04-05 Thread David D. Rea
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:54 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: The Canon 300D and A75 don't present themselves as mass storage devices, so I doubt the 20D does either. You can access it with gphoto, or by using camera:/ in Konqueror, but not as a block device. Personally, I prefer to use a card

Re: [gentoo-user] USB mass storage help

2005-04-05 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:03:57 -0400, David D. Rea wrote: Just needed something for the short term, until I can get a CF card reader that doesn't have a history of hosing CF cards! Use gphoto, Digikam (my preference) or Konqueror. -- Neil Bothwick Few women admit their age. Few men act

Re: [gentoo-user] USB mass storage help

2005-04-05 Thread Sarpy Sam
On Apr 5, 2005 5:22 AM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:03:57 -0400, David D. Rea wrote: Just needed something for the short term, until I can get a CF card reader that doesn't have a history of hosing CF cards! Use gphoto, Digikam (my preference) or

Re: [gentoo-user] USB mass storage help

2005-04-05 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:34:10 -0600, Sarpy Sam wrote: The Canon 20D is not supported by the present stable version of Gphoto2 2.1.4. It is supported by the gphoto2 2.1.5 but it isn't marked as stable yet in portage for ~x86. Does anybody know what the problem is that it isn't marked stable