Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-24 Thread Frank Hellmuth
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 02:35, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: > Frank Hellmuth wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I noticed today that I have linux-2.4.20-gentoo-r3, -r4 and -r5 sources > > on my hard disk, working and backup kernel are both r5. > > [...] > I hope that makes things clearer for you. Thanks to all

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread Dhruba Bandopadhyay
Frank Hellmuth wrote: Hi! I noticed today that I have linux-2.4.20-gentoo-r3, -r4 and -r5 sources on my hard disk, working and backup kernel are both r5. Every time a kernel source package is emerged portage makes a record of all files and dirs placed on your system. When upgrading the kernel s

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread Frank Hellmuth
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 01:06, Heschi Kreinick wrote: > It's out of the portage tree, but for many reasons, which you can probably > guess a few of, it's a good idea to keep around information about the > package, and your system, as they were when you installed it. If you look > in /var/db/pkg, yo

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread Heschi Kreinick
It's out of the portage tree, but for many reasons, which you can probably guess a few of, it's a good idea to keep around information about the package, and your system, as they were when you installed it. If you look in /var/db/pkg, you'll see that every package you saves a whole bunch of informa

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread Frank Hellmuth
On Monday 23 June 2003 19:25, Heschi Kreinick wrote: > Works better if you use the right names. emerge -C gentoo-sources-2.4.20-r3 > or whatever. > -Heschi Thanks, it worked. I just looked into /usr/portage/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/ and found just ChangeLog gentoo-sources-2.4.19-r10.ebuild Man

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread Christoph Kluge
On Monday 23 June 2003 19:16, Ohad Lutzky wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 05:37:21PM +0200, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > > did you do 'make mrproper' between the compiles when it didn't work? it > > cleans up so it should be like a newly emerged tree. > > By the way, what's the difference between th

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread Heschi Kreinick
Works better if you use the right names. emerge -C gentoo-sources-2.4.20-r3 or whatever. -Heschi - Original Message - From: "Frank Hellmuth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:27 PM Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread Ohad Lutzky
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 05:37:21PM +0200, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > did you do 'make mrproper' between the compiles when it didn't work? it > cleans up so it should be like a newly emerged tree. By the way, what's the difference between that and "make distclean"? -- Tactless "If it wasn't for

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread Frank Hellmuth
On Monday 23 June 2003 15:14, MAL wrote: > Frank Hellmuth wrote: > > Is it safe to do a > > > > #emerge -C linux-2.4.20-gentoo-r3 linux-2.4.20-gentoo-r4 > > They aren't cleaned, as often previous sources are needed still, such as > when you want to compile a module for a previous version. > > Even

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread Lars Juel Nielsen
did you do 'make mrproper' between the compiles when it didn't work? it cleans up so it should be like a newly emerged tree. On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 16:02, daniel wrote: > On June 23, 2003 08:53 am, Frank Hellmuth wrote: > > I noticed today that I have linux-2.4.20-gentoo-r3, -r4 and -r5 sources >

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread nmeyers
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:02:32AM -0400, daniel wrote: > On June 23, 2003 08:53 am, Frank Hellmuth wrote: > > I noticed today that I have linux-2.4.20-gentoo-r3, -r4 and -r5 sources > > on my hard disk, working and backup kernel are both r5. > > > > or are the old versions (or at least the headers

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread daniel
On June 23, 2003 08:53 am, Frank Hellmuth wrote: > I noticed today that I have linux-2.4.20-gentoo-r3, -r4 and -r5 sources > on my hard disk, working and backup kernel are both r5. > > or are the old versions (or at least the headers) still needed? > > If it's OK to clean them, why doesn't portage

Re: [gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread MAL
Frank Hellmuth wrote: Hi! I noticed today that I have linux-2.4.20-gentoo-r3, -r4 and -r5 sources on my hard disk, working and backup kernel are both r5. #emerge clean tells me there are no outdated packages on my system. I understand that the kernel sources are an important part of the system, b

[gentoo-user] Why keeping old kernel sources?

2003-06-23 Thread Frank Hellmuth
Hi! I noticed today that I have linux-2.4.20-gentoo-r3, -r4 and -r5 sources on my hard disk, working and backup kernel are both r5. #emerge clean tells me there are no outdated packages on my system. I understand that the kernel sources are an important part of the system, but since I slowly run