Re: [gentoo-user] advice regarding LVM needed

2003-09-15 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag, 15. September 2003 18:12 schrieb ext Gour: > Dirk Heinrichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Both LVM2 and EVMS2 use Sistina's Device Mapper which has been > > integrated into 2.6 in favor of LVM1. > > What do you recommend: LVM2 or EVMS2 since both use the same Device > Mapper? Depends o

Re: [gentoo-user] advice regarding LVM needed

2003-09-15 Thread Matthew Vaughn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Both EVMS2 and LVM2 are backwards-compatible with LVM1 and the volumes generated by it. Stroller wrote: | | On 15 Sep 2003, at 2:05 pm, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: | |> Am Montag, 15. September 2003 15:04 schrieb Collins Richey: |> |>> Correct me if I'm wrong

Re: [gentoo-user] advice regarding LVM needed

2003-09-15 Thread Stroller
On 15 Sep 2003, at 2:05 pm, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: Am Montag, 15. September 2003 15:04 schrieb Collins Richey: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the 2.6 kernel dropped support for LVM, and thus EVMS is now the only way to fly? Both LVM2 and EVMS2 use Sistina's Device Mapper which has been i

Re: [gentoo-user] advice regarding LVM needed

2003-09-15 Thread Gour
Dirk Heinrichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Both LVM2 and EVMS2 use Sistina's Device Mapper which has been integrated > into 2.6 in favor of LVM1. What do you recommend: LVM2 or EVMS2 since both use the same Device Mapper? Sincerely, Gour -- Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Linux User #27849

Re: [gentoo-user] advice regarding LVM needed

2003-09-15 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag, 15. September 2003 15:04 schrieb Collins Richey: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the 2.6 kernel dropped support for > LVM, and thus EVMS is now the only way to fly? Both LVM2 and EVMS2 use Sistina's Device Mapper which has been integrated into 2.6 in favor of LVM1. HTH...

Re: [gentoo-user] advice regarding LVM needed

2003-09-15 Thread Collins Richey
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:45:07 -0500 Stephen Boulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been very happy with LVM. I have /root on reiserfs and /boot on ext2, > but all my other partitions are on LVM and are reiserfs: > > > I don't know how representative my experiences have been, but I ended up

Re: [gentoo-user] advice regarding LVM needed

2003-09-15 Thread Stephen Boulet
I've been very happy with LVM. I have /root on reiserfs and /boot on ext2, but all my other partitions are on LVM and are reiserfs: FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda3 2.9G 243M 2.6G 9% / /dev/vg/usr10G 6.5G 3.6G 65% /usr /dev/vg/usr_lo

Re: [gentoo-user] advice regarding LVM needed

2003-09-15 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag, 15. September 2003 08:57 schrieb Gour: > Today I'm going to trash my old IBM HD (together with SuSE :-) and > install a new one, so I'm thinking about LVM install. > > Do you recommend it for two HDs (120G & 80G) install on home machine? Yes, why not? I'd use EVMS, though. > In Gentoo'

[gentoo-user] advice regarding LVM needed

2003-09-14 Thread Gour
Hi! Recently I bought Gentoo 1.4 and installed it on my 2nd HD's free space (WD - 80G) wanting to have a slow transition from SuSE to Gentoo (to keep old mail, news ..). I emerged binary packages of X & KDE and then started to slowly emerge other components. However, three days ago, my old HD (I