[gentoo-user] subversion + apache2 = emerge madnes?

2005-01-22 Thread Stoian Ivanov
Yesterday I emerged subversion with USE='apache-2' emerge subversion today after a regular emerge --sync ; emerge -auD world I got myself in an interesting situation: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # emerge -auD world These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating world dependencies

Re: [gentoo-user] subversion + apache2 = emerge madnes?

2005-01-22 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:47:18 +0200 Stoian Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Yesterday I emerged subversion with USE='apache-2' emerge subversion First, use package.use, not USE on the commandline. Second, you probably want apache2, not apache-2. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim,

[gentoo-user] subversion emerge blocked.

2004-01-23 Thread Kurt Guenther
tumbleweed portage # emerge =sys-devel/autoconf-2.58 it looks like it did it tumbleweed portage # emerge -p subversion These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild N] dev-lang/swig-1.3.19 [blocks B ] =sys-devel/autoconf-2.58* (from

Re: [gentoo-user] subversion emerge blocked.

2004-01-23 Thread Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
It is autoconf-2.58* that is blocked. You need to install a different version of autoconf. -- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] subversion emerge blocked.

2004-01-23 Thread Kurt Guenther
Right. Call my grasshopper. Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote: It is autoconf-2.58* that is blocked. You need to install a different version of autoconf. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion masked

2004-01-19 Thread Tom Eastman
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:43, Andrew Cowie wrote: On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 03:09, Kurt Guenther wrote: I see that there is an ebuild for subversion, but it is masked. Does anybody know what is up here? How do I find out status, etc? You'd do well to pop into #svn on freenode and lurk and

[gentoo-user] Subversion masked

2004-01-16 Thread Kurt Guenther
I see that there is an ebuild for subversion, but it is masked. Does anybody know what is up here? How do I find out status, etc? --Kurt -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion masked

2004-01-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:39:12 -0500 Kurt Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I see that there is an ebuild for subversion, but it is masked. Does | anybody know what is up here? How do I find out status, etc? It's marked as ~x86, which means it's not been heavily tested. If you've done lots of

Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion masked

2004-01-16 Thread Andrew Cowie
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 03:09, Kurt Guenther wrote: I see that there is an ebuild for subversion, but it is masked. Does anybody know what is up here? How do I find out status, etc? You'd do well to pop into #svn on freenode and lurk and listen for a while. From them, for example, I found out

[gentoo-user] subversion

2003-09-02 Thread Alcino Dall Igna Junior
Today I upgrade subversion from 0.27.0 to 0.28.0 and get this kind of version error. Other operations give the same result. The db4_recover or svnadmin recover doesn't help. Ideas? TIA Alcino svn commit svn: Unsupported repository version svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: OPTIONS

[gentoo-user] subversion

2003-09-02 Thread Alcino Dall Igna Junior
Forget that never mind... :( After a successful (or at least an apparently success) commit, I get this: svn log svn: Berkeley DB error svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/repos/bin' svn: Berkeley DB error while opening environment for filesystem /home/svn/repos/db: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal

Re: [gentoo-user] subversion

2003-09-02 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 02 September 2003 21:55, Alcino Dall Igna Junior wrote: Forget that never mind... :( After a successful (or at least an apparently success) commit, I get this: svn log svn: Berkeley DB error svn: PROPFIND request failed on

Re: [gentoo-user] subversion

2003-09-02 Thread Alcino Dall Igna Junior
Yes, I delete the old and recreate a new repository, but I think that should have a better way to do this. In a fast scan in subversion site I find nothing. As far as I can see, I will downgrade and wait. T. Alcino On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:59, Mike Williams wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [gentoo-user] subversion

2003-09-02 Thread Steven Knight
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:43, Alcino Dall Igna Junior wrote: Today I upgrade subversion from 0.27.0 to 0.28.0 and get this kind of version error. Other operations give the same result. The db4_recover or svnadmin recover doesn't help. Ideas? Hi, At issue is that the 0.28.0 release of

[gentoo-user] Subversion Ebuild

2003-08-24 Thread Tom Eastman
Hey all, Is there anyone out there who uses the new subversion ebuilds in portage? I've used subversion heavily since November, but I never used the gentoo-provided ebuilds because they were so out of date, and Berkeley 4.0.14 seemed to do weird stuff whenever I tried to emerge it. On my