I got a Dell last summer, in which I couldn't get the network chip
running, so I bought a cheap Via Rhine PCI network card and used that
for almost a year. I finally got the built-in chip working today on the
older 530. This post is being sent on it. It's a bastardized Intel
chip that shows up
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 09:12:53AM -0400, Matthew R. Lee wrote
> I'm thinking of buying a dell Ubuntu desktop (Inspiron 530MT) for my lab. The
> university has an arrangement that can get me a discount. I have a question,
> has anyone bought one of these and installed gentoo on it? I sure it wil
Hi ALL
I have installed snort-2.6.1.3-r1, mysql-5.0 and acid-0.9.6b23.tar.gz
Everything works fine, except the one thing :
When I launch acid to see the alerts, instead of signature message I see a
number
I ran acid in debug mode, but it did help me too mach.
If is there need to load
Andreas,
Thanks very much for the information.
Yes! I do seem to have *.la files with "-lselinux" in them. It looks
like I'm going to have to do some purging and re-emerging to fix things.
Thanks again.
--- Vladimir
on 07/07/2008 04:49 PM Andreas Niederl said the following:
Hi,
Vladimir G
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joerg, you have a certain opinion... and that is all it is! Other
people, some of them Debian maintainers have a different one. This is a
common situation, and it is allowed - in fact desirable in many situations.
If said opi
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:26:18 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I'm just guessing: should I create a unix-domain socket in
> /var/spool/postfix/private/postgrey?
> Or should starting postgrey take care of that?
It should, and does here, can you confirm that the socket does not exist?
--
Neil Bothwi
I'm trying to be a good netizen and set up spam filtering (prior to
forwarding traffic).
I'm having trouble configuring postgrey for this purpose. I thought I
followed all the
directions, but there appears to be a step missing.
Anyway, the system is pretty simple: a single machine, with a few ali
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:42:57 +0200, Marko Kocić wrote:
> the problem is that USE flags are not changed, but
> CROSSCOMPILE_HEADER_OPTIONS New option is added there which is not used
> anyways.
The other options can also be changed in files in the same directory.
Please don't top post, unless back
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Matthew R. Lee wrote:
> I'm thinking of buying a dell Ubuntu desktop (Inspiron 530MT) for my
> lab. The university has an arrangement that can get me a discount. I
> have a question, has anyone bought one of these and installed gentoo
> on it?
Your question as stated doe
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:34:53 +0200
"Marko Kocić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does that mean that I will be prompted to recompile when some flag
> that is used is changed or when new version becomes available?
>
from the man page:
"Portage will not attempt to update a package that is listed here
Thanks,
the problem is that USE flags are not changed, but CROSSCOMPILE_HEADER_OPTIONS
New option is added there which is not used anyways.
I'll try that as soon as I can.
>> The same story applies to different packages. If new USE flag is added
>> which I don't use anyways, I still have to recom
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:14:13 +0200, Marko Kocić wrote:
> The same story applies to different packages. If new USE flag is added
> which I don't use anyways, I still have to recompile the same version
> of package because emerge bugs me to do it.
>
> Does anyone knows how to avoid unnecessary recom
Does that mean that I will be prompted to recompile when some flag
that is used is changed or when new version becomes available?
Thanks,
Marko
2008/7/8 Kenneth Prugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:14:13 +0200
> "Marko Kocić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone knows about e
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:14:13 +0200
"Marko Kocić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone knows about emerge --inject equivalent? Inject was used to
> tell (lie to) portage that some package is installed alhough it is
> not.
>
> What I was to trying to do is to avoid recompilation of the whole
> g
Roger Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to install firefox-bin on a new (to me) machine.
> pango-1.20.3 is a depenency that, unfortunately fails to build:
>
On a hunch I changed CFLAGS from -mtune=pentium4 to -march=i686 and
did emerge -e world.
Now pango compiles without any proble
Does anyone knows about emerge --inject equivalent? Inject was used to
tell (lie to) portage that some package is installed alhough it is
not.
What I was to trying to do is to avoid recompilation of the whole
glibc because new flag fas been added to CROSSCOMPILE_OPTIONS.
emerge -uDN world keeps me
On Monday 07 July 2008, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I decided to go with UUIDs in /etc/fstab. After a half-hour or so
> pfutzing around with these
> (how do you find the UUID of an unmounted partition when you're not
> even really sure
> what kind of filesystem it has),
blkid
part of e2fsprogs
> Th
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [08.07.08 15:10]:
> Sascha Hlusiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Some hints to you:
>
> If you replace nail A by nail B, it still remains a nail.
>
> If you believe that "the schily makefilesystem" refers to
> "scripts used to control compilatio
Sascha Hlusiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag 08 Juli 2008 16:12:43 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> > Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The cdrtools tarball includes a file called "Makefile" in every
> > > directory. The cdrkit includes a file called "CMakeList.txt" in every
>
I don't really know off of the top. Based off of secondhand knowledge none
that I can recall.
However, the best thing I can think of to be sure everything works is to get
the latest knoppix DVD and then run that. If the basics work right off of
the bat (WLAN,video,sound,Power functions) then you s
Am Dienstag 08 Juli 2008 16:12:43 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The cdrtools tarball includes a file called "Makefile" in every
> > directory. The cdrkit includes a file called "CMakeList.txt" in every
> > directory. THAT FILE has a copyright and license
Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The cdrtools tarball includes a file called "Makefile" in every
> directory. The cdrkit includes a file called "CMakeList.txt" in every
> directory. THAT FILE has a copyright and license terms attached to it,
> just like any other source file.
>
> I
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Well, now that you found this out, does this mean that you finally concur with
me that Bloch & Co. are license trolls?
Not being so emotionally attached to the isse as you are, I'm not going
to resort to name calling. I will say that the issue, in my opinion, is
nowhe
I'm thinking of buying a dell Ubuntu desktop (Inspiron 530MT) for my lab. The
university has an arrangement that can get me a discount. I have a question,
has anyone bought one of these and installed gentoo on it? I sure it will
work, I'm just wondering if there are any tweaks that dell have ma
Sascha Hlusiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The next step in understanding why Bloch is a license troll is to
> > understand that _iff_ Bloch/Debian seriuosly believe that "the schily
> > makefilesystem" is part of cdrtools and needs to be published under GPL
> > together with cdrtools, then _of
> > And before you tell me to "look again" or "go read something" or
> > whatever -- I did. I have the cdrkit source tarball right here, and I'm
> > looking at the files in question. I also have a copy of the GPL, which
> > says exactly this: "plus the scripts used to control compilation and
> >
Am Dienstag 08 Juli 2008 10:26:40 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> "Arttu V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/7/08, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Let me quote _this_ file to verify that there is a 4 clause BSDL.
> >
> > Jörg, there are indeed four asterisks/clauses to count. But wh
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's right, Alan made no comment as to the correctness or otherwise of
> the opinion. He only stated that this opinion was held and that was the
> reason for the use of cdrkit, both statements are factually correct.
The problem is that this includes an
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:22:39 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> There are license violations in other packages from Debian where
> I _could_ sue Debian.
Have you pointed these out to the Debian devs? What was their response?
Has your lawyer contacted them? You are not American, legal action
doesn't
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:17:41 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > You are not allowed to "report" other opinions if they are known to
> > > be be wrong.
> >
> > Of course you are, as long as you are reporting that the person holds
> > the opinion without endorsing it, you may even be doing it to
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [08.07.08 12:19]:
> Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm just stating that that OpenSolaris hardly counts, because the whole
> > thing is under CDDL.
> > Which btw allows SUN or any other to restrict access to any improvement
> > they make.
Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just stating that that OpenSolaris hardly counts, because the whole
> thing is under CDDL.
> Which btw allows SUN or any other to restrict access to any improvement
> they make.
Please finally stop your childish FUD now!
Your claim is an obvio
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [07.07.08 17:46]:
> Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Please finally stop your FUD!
> > >
> > > The CDDL definitely is a free license and Sun will definitely not publish
> > > any packages that could create problems.
> > >
> > I *never* st
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg, you have a certain opinion... and that is all it is! Other
> people, some of them Debian maintainers have a different one. This is a
> common situation, and it is allowed - in fact desirable in many situations.
>
> If said opinions are believed t
2008/7/8, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=229953
Try media-video/transcode-1.0.4-r3!
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
This is what I'm getting, is there a fix?
=
optional package support
IBPno
X11yes
libmpeg2 yes
libpostprocno
freetype2
"Arttu V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/7/08, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let me quote _this_ file to verify that there is a 4 clause BSDL.
>
> Jörg, there are indeed four asterisks/clauses to count. But which
> clause represents the original "GPL-incompatible" advertising
Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firstly, the cdrkit source ships with all of the cmake scripts that are
> needed by cmake to build the project. This is all that is required by
> the GPL.
>
> And before you tell me to "look again" or "go read something" or
> whatever -- I did. I ha
Logging in anonymously fails, so check syslog and find;
Jul 8 17:40:22 absydos proftpd[17200]: absydos - ProFTPD 1.3.1rc2 (devel)
(built Sun Aug 5 06:10:17 EST 2007) standalone mode STARTUP
Jul 8 17:40:28 absydos proftpd[17213]: absydos (10.28.209.110[10.28.209.110])
- FTP session opened.
Jul
39 matches
Mail list logo
