A couple of days ago chronyd stopped functioning.
This is all that the logs tell me but I don't know what I can do to fix it:
=
May 19 06:25:13 lappy chronyd[6756]: chronyd version 1.23 starting
May 19 06:25:14 lappy chronyd[6756]: Se
Ric de France wrote:
2009/5/19 Kevin Coetzee mailto:kdcoet...@gmail.com>>
Adam Carter wrote:
The time has come to edit make.conf on my new gentoo-netbook.
But one thing has always bothered me: What's the point of
specifying a *negative* flag with a hyph
2009/5/19 Kevin Coetzee
> Adam Carter wrote:
>
>> The time has come to edit make.conf on my new gentoo-netbook.
>>> But one thing has always bothered me: What's the point of
>>> specifying a *negative* flag with a hyphen? Why not just
>>> leave the flags you don't use out of the file entirely?
>>
Adam Carter wrote:
The time has come to edit make.conf on my new gentoo-netbook.
But one thing has always bothered me: What's the point of
specifying a *negative* flag with a hyphen? Why not just
leave the flags you don't use out of the file entirely?
Some flags are on by default, so this stops
> The time has come to edit make.conf on my new gentoo-netbook.
> But one thing has always bothered me: What's the point of
> specifying a *negative* flag with a hyphen? Why not just
> leave the flags you don't use out of the file entirely?
Some flags are on by default, so this stops their use.
Hi group,
The time has come to edit make.conf on my new gentoo-netbook. But one thing has
always bothered me: What's the point of specifying a *negative* flag with a
hyphen? Why not just leave the flags you don't use out of the file entirely?
In a related matter, is there a paludis equivalent
On Monday 18 May 2009 22:14:43 bn wrote:
> > If you use Ubuntu, you've got to accept their eccentric & questionable
> > attitude to passwords, esp that they don't have a separate root password.
> > I find that a piece of cheap popularisation contrary to UNIX principles.
Huh?
The package you are t
Philip Webb ha scritto:
> 090518 bn wrote:
>> Philip Webb ha scritto:
>>> With binary distros, you are stuck with whatever their makers give you.
>> whatever distro you're using, Linux is Linux. You're not locked out.
>> If my xorg.conf doesn't work (it happened with Ubuntu),
>> I can edit it on Ub
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> Genuine analysis of Gentoo machines admined by someone who knows how to do it
> should that the machine can easily have only the features and software on it
> that the admin say it should have. Like LDAP - not everyone needs it. On a
> binary distro, if the maintainer su
On Monday 18 May 2009 19:59:14 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 07:39:48PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Monday 18 May 2009 19:12:22 William Hubbs wrote:
> > > Another difference is that, since you are compiling everything from
> > > source, with the correct CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS s
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:42:54PM +0100, bn wrote:
> > So, I would really want to understand where the Gentoo flexibility beats
> > down a binary distro.
>
> > Don't get me wrong -I like Gentoo. Really. But the claim that a binary
> > distro is "unfixable" just because I had
090518 bn wrote:
> Philip Webb ha scritto:
>> With binary distros, you are stuck with whatever their makers give you.
> whatever distro you're using, Linux is Linux. You're not locked out.
> If my xorg.conf doesn't work (it happened with Ubuntu),
> I can edit it on Ubuntu just like on Gentoo.
> I c
On Monday 18 May 2009 19:12:22 William Hubbs wrote:
> Another difference is that, since you are compiling everything from
> source, with the correct CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS settings in make.conf, you
> can optimize the binaries you produce to take full advantage of your
> processor, which you can't do
On Monday 18 May 2009 18:42:54 bn wrote:
> But anyway you have packages in Gentoo or in Ubuntu: in Gentoo you are
> stuck with what whatever the packagers give you the same. You probably
> have more versions available and some more flexibility, but that's it.
>
> So, I would really want to understa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:42:54PM +0100, bn wrote:
> So, I would really want to understand where the Gentoo flexibility beats
> down a binary distro.
>
> Don't get me wrong -I like Gentoo. Really. But the claim that a binary
> distro is "unfixable" j
Hi,
yes I know I could use ~ in package.keywords. But is there a good reason
why postgres is still @8.0 and not at least 8.2?
Regards,
Konstantin
--
Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet: elw...@agouros.de
Otkerstr. 28, 81547 Muenchen, Germany. Tel +49 89 69370185
Philip Webb ha scritto:
> 090518 bn wrote:
>> Philip Webb ha scritto:
>>> Hopefully, the OP has got some useful hints out of all this ...
>> Yes. I'm kinda considering switching to Ubuntu.
>> I love Gentoo, it's almost 4 years I'm using it, but I need this laptop
>> to *work*, and I cannot afford t
090518 bn wrote:
> Philip Webb ha scritto:
>> Hopefully, the OP has got some useful hints out of all this ...
> Yes. I'm kinda considering switching to Ubuntu.
> I love Gentoo, it's almost 4 years I'm using it, but I need this laptop
> to *work*, and I cannot afford to be consistently bitten by suc
Philip Webb ha scritto:
> 090518 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 May 2009 07:29:00 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
>>> The blurb tells me nothing, but if I follow its advice, I do get :
>> I said there was help, I didn't claim it was helpful :)
>> I got bitten by this one a while ago on a box using a
090518 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 07:29:00 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
>> The blurb tells me nothing, but if I follow its advice, I do get :
> I said there was help, I didn't claim it was helpful :)
> I got bitten by this one a while ago on a box using a mixture
> of SATA and PATA dis
On Mon, 18 May 2009 07:29:00 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > Of course there's help. Most options give a choice of y/n/m/?.
>
> Yes (red face). However, the crucial option here was ATA_SFF ,
> for which 'make oldconfig' gives :
>
> ATA SFF support (ATA_SFF) [Y/n/?] (NEW) ?
>
> This option
090517 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:18:14 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
>> 'make oldconfig' is the usual recommendation, but there's no help:
>> it's just a list of "Do you want to ... ?" which you can't save easily.
> Of course there's help. Most options give a choice of y/n/m/?.
Ye
22 matches
Mail list logo
