On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0600, Dale wrote:
Well, that is one of the things I want to change. I have several
reasons for wanting to change this mess. One is a file system change
and the other is to use LVM for stuff. I basically want LVM for
everything but root itself and /boot of
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0600, Dale wrote:
Well, that is one of the things I want to change. I have several
reasons for wanting to change this mess. One is a file system change
and the other is to use LVM for stuff. I basically want LVM for
everything but root
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:45:53 -0600, Dale wrote:
I'm going to try to beat some sense into this a while longer then I'm
going to bed, right after rm -rfv /mnt/gentoo/* is started. ;-)
What's the point in using -v if you're not there to watch it? ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
Documentation: (n.) a
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:45:53 -0600, Dale wrote:
I decided to do a fresh install on the larger drive. I sort of like to
brush up every once in a while. I got to the point where I want to do a
emerge -e system then copy my world file over and finish it up. It
appears that the stage3 tarball
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:45:53 -0600, Dale wrote:
I decided to do a fresh install on the larger drive. I sort of like to
brush up every once in a while. I got to the point where I want to do a
emerge -e system then copy my world file over and finish it up. It
appears
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:30:41 -0600, Dale wrote:
I've seen that if you switch to ~arch and make wholesale USE flag
changes. I think I avoided most of it by switching arch, doing emerge
-e system or world and then changing USE flags.
I even tried USE=-* emerge -e system and it just griped.
On 2012-03-10 03:48, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
Howdy!
this? I'm thinking about redoing my partition layout. I'm wanting to
keep / (root) on a normal ext4 file system. I want to put /usr, /var,
As long as you don't use the udev version that requires access to /usr
at boot time (or mdev) then you
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 03:45 -0600, Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0600, Dale wrote:
Well, that is one of the things I want to change. I have several
reasons for wanting to change this mess. One is a file system change
and the other is to use LVM for
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:30:41 -0600, Dale wrote:
I've seen that if you switch to ~arch and make wholesale USE flag
changes. I think I avoided most of it by switching arch, doing emerge
-e system or world and then changing USE flags.
I even tried USE=-* emerge -e system
Hi there!
Is there an advantage in putting the portage tree on an extra partition?
Currently, I'm using reiserfs, because I read that it is efficient when
using many small files. On the other hand I also heard that it tends to
get slower with every emerge --sync.
Space is no longer an argument
Alex Schuster wrote:
Hi there!
Is there an advantage in putting the portage tree on an extra partition?
Currently, I'm using reiserfs, because I read that it is efficient when
using many small files. On the other hand I also heard that it tends to
get slower with every emerge --sync.
Am 10.03.2012 14:30, schrieb Alex Schuster:
Hi there!
Is there an advantage in putting the portage tree on an extra partition?
Yes. It allows you to use a smaller and more appropriate block size like
1k or 2k which decreases internal fragmentation. It also increases
locality of data,
On Mar 10, 2012 8:33 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Hi there!
Is there an advantage in putting the portage tree on an extra partition?
Currently, I'm using reiserfs, because I read that it is efficient when
using many small files. On the other hand I also heard that it tends
On Mar 10, 2012 10:09 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Mar 10, 2012 8:33 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Hi there!
Is there an advantage in putting the portage tree on an extra partition?
Currently, I'm using reiserfs, because I read that it is efficient
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:30:15 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
Any tips on this? Does it make sense to use a special file system just
for the portage tree? What would be best? Would it help to re-create
this file system from time to time in case it gets slower with every
sync?
I use an ext2
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:58:18 +0100, pk wrote:
Btw, does anyone know which version of udev requires access to /usr? I'm
running latest stable here 171-r5 and I have separate partitions for
/home /opt /usr /usr/local /tmp /var, all on LVM and /boot on a separate
partition outside of LVM, and it
* Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [120309 21:55]:
Howdy,
[..]
[0.787822] Trying to unpack rootfs image as initramfs...
It found your initramfs...
[0.867787] Freeing initrd memory: 5084k freed
The followng look like they're from your Dracut initramfs
[0.880111] audit: initializing
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:09:26 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Mar 10, 2012 8:33 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Hi there!
Is there an advantage in putting the portage tree on an extra
partition?
Currently, I'm using reiserfs, because I read that it is
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 03:35:05PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:30:15 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
Any tips on this? Does it make sense to use a special file system just
for the portage tree? What would be best? Would it help to re-create
this file system from time to
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Bryan Gardiner b...@khumba.net wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 09:09:37 -0800
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
I just ran it, here's the output:
Found 22 processes using
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:36:07 +0100, YoYo Siska wrote:
I use an ext2 filesystem for portage, it's still the fastest out
there. Journals are unnecessary because its such a small filesystem,
and if it does get damaged I can just reformat and sync again.
I use an ext2 partition in a 500MB
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Bryan Gardiner b...@khumba.net wrote:
SNIP
From Paul's output:
sys-apps/smartmontools:
5082 /usr/sbin/smartd
sys-auth/consolekit:
4384 /usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon
On 2012-03-10 16:35, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'm using the latest testing with a separate /usr and no problems.
So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr
then? Thanks for the info!
Best regards
Peter K
Dear All,
I would like to ask some help! I would like to use gmail smtp to send
my email from my domain which is sayusi.hu, and the email address is
sayusi.a...@sayusi.hu. Unfortunately, gmail smtp always overwrite the
sender email address. If I would like to subscribe for a mailing list
with
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:50 PM, pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
On 2012-03-10 16:35, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'm using the latest testing with a separate /usr and no problems.
So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr
then? Thanks for the info!
That's one case; I would
Todd Goodman wrote:
* Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [120309 21:55]:
Howdy,
[..]
[0.787822] Trying to unpack rootfs image as initramfs...
It found your initramfs...
[0.867787] Freeing initrd memory: 5084k freed
The followng look like they're from your Dracut initramfs
[
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:50:02 +0100, pk wrote:
I'm using the latest testing with a separate /usr and no problems.
So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr
then? Thanks for the info!
testing, not masked. Although it turns out that the latest in ~amd64 is
the same
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:50 PM, pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
On 2012-03-10 16:35, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'm using the latest testing with a separate /usr and no problems.
So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr
then? Thanks for the info!
Just posted to -devel,
-- Sent from my Palm Pre
On Mar 10, 2012 10:38 AM, Neil Bothwick lt;n...@digimed.co.ukgt; wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:58:18 +0100, pk wrote:
gt; Btw, does anyone know which version of udev requires access to /usr? I'm
gt; running latest stable here 171-r5 and I have separate partitions
29 matches
Mail list logo
