On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:26:13 +
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:32:24 +0200
> nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
>
> > My thanks, too! There's nothing like reading on some actual
> > experience with this. So this was once the reason to keep /
> > separate. Not that im
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:32:24 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
> > Thanks for sharing your experience, and not just your emotions. One
> > of my favorite quotes is, "A man with an experience is not subject
> > to a man with an argument."
>
> My thanks, too! There's nothing like
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:49:53 -0600
Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:10:43PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> > That was the original reason for having / and /usr separate, and it
> > dates back to the early 70s. The other reason that stems from that
> > time period is the size of
When I need a new web-based software tool, I consider writing it myself and
if that isn't feasible I try to use something open-source and self-hosted.
I need something for chat, task management, resource management, and code
management, all for groups. I'm considering Campfire, Trello, Float, and
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:39 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Sunday, December 16, 2012 01:52:46 PM Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, 15. Dezember 2012, 20:57:24 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>>> > Even on a system with only 2 sockets, it can be useful to have NUMA
>>> > available.
>>>
>>> or no
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/17/2012 01:09 AM, Dale wrote:
>> So, since I have /usr separate from the rest, I could mount it read only
>> and reduce the chance of corruption if say my UPS failed? I already do
>> this for /boot. Interesting. Very interesting indeed.
>>
>> If the other issues
On 12/17/2012 01:09 AM, Dale wrote:
>
> So, since I have /usr separate from the rest, I could mount it read only
> and reduce the chance of corruption if say my UPS failed? I already do
> this for /boot. Interesting. Very interesting indeed.
>
> If the other issues happen, computers is likely
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/17/2012 12:44 AM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> Question. A file system, /usr for example, is mounted read only. The
>> system crashes for whatever reason such as a power failure. Since it is
>> mounted read only, would there be a larger or smaller risk of corrupted
>> data o
On 12/17/2012 12:44 AM, Dale wrote:
>>
>
>
> Question. A file system, /usr for example, is mounted read only. The
> system crashes for whatever reason such as a power failure. Since it is
> mounted read only, would there be a larger or smaller risk of corrupted
> data on that partition? From
On Dec 17, 2012 7:31 AM, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:32:24 +0200
> nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
>
> > My thanks, too! There's nothing like reading on some actual experience
> > with this. So this was once the reason to keep / separate. Not that
> > important
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:32:24 +0200
> nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
>
>> My thanks, too! There's nothing like reading on some actual experience
>> with this. So this was once the reason to keep / separate. Not that
>> important anymore (but this is still no exc
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 02:41:52AM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 17/12/12 01:56, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:11:46PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> If you really want "-ggdb" instead of just "-g", then use that instead,
> >> though it will take more space f
On 17/12/12 01:56, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:11:46PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
If you really want "-ggdb" instead of just "-g", then use that instead,
though it will take more space for no real benefit, unless you actually
need the extra debug info for some reaso
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:32:24 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
> My thanks, too! There's nothing like reading on some actual experience
> with this. So this was once the reason to keep / separate. Not that
> important anymore (but this is still no excuse to force people to keep
>
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:11:46PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > I would like to include debug info into more of my system, but still not the
> > whole userland. So I'd like to start with libs. But how do I tell portage do
> > to it?
> > I've been using portage/env before for selected packag
On 17/12/12 00:14, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am Sonntag, 16. Dezember 2012, 23:19:46 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 15/12/12 12:18, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2012, 21:34:54 schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:53:35 -0800
Mark Knecht wrote:
I guess the
Am Sonntag, 16. Dezember 2012, 23:19:46 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
> On 15/12/12 12:18, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2012, 21:34:54 schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
> >> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:53:35 -0800
> >>
> >> Mark Knecht wrote:
> >>> I guess the other question that's lurk
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:50:02 -0800, Bryan Gardiner wrote:
> What about software that refers to files in /usr/share/doc? I can't
> remember what program it was, but one I used a while back had a Help
> menu item that tried to open a manual living there, but of course the
> manual was compressed an
On 2012-12-16, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 15/12/12 12:18, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2012, 21:34:54 schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
>>
>>> On OpenBSD which has the benefit of userland being part of it. All the
>>> critical single user binaries are in root and built statical
On 15/12/12 12:18, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2012, 21:34:54 schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:53:35 -0800
Mark Knecht wrote:
I guess the other question that's lurking here for me is why do you
have /usr on a separate partition? What's the usage model th
On 16/12/12 22:19, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Hello again,
I would like to include debug info into more of my system, but still not the
whole userland. So I'd like to start with libs. But how do I tell portage do
to it?
I've been using portage/env before for selected packages, namely:
$ cat /etc
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:39:59 + (UTC)
James wrote:
> Upon syncing, my system wants to upgrade to eudev.
>
> [blocks B] sys-fs/udev ("sys-fs/udev" is blocking sys-fs/eudev-0)
>
>
> Not much out there; but I gleaned it is for those
> that insist on a separate partition for /var and /usr.
> An
Nuno J. Silva wrote:
> My thanks, too! There's nothing like reading on some actual experience
> with this. So this was once the reason to keep / separate. Not that
> important anymore (but this is still no excuse to force people to keep
> /usr in the same filesystem).
Mines on a separate partitio
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:08:54 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
> On 2012-12-15, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > The file
> >
> > /etc/conf.d/net
> >
> > reports that I can seen an example format at this location:
> >
> > /usr/share/doc/openrc/net.example
>
> As
On 2012-12-16, Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:10:43PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> That was the original reason for having / and /usr separate, and it
>> dates back to the early 70s. The other reason that stems from that time
>> period is the size of disks we had back then -
Hello again,
I would like to include debug info into more of my system, but still not the
whole userland. So I'd like to start with libs. But how do I tell portage do
to it?
I've been using portage/env before for selected packages, namely:
$ cat /etc/portage/debug-build
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:10:43PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> That was the original reason for having / and /usr separate, and it
> dates back to the early 70s. The other reason that stems from that time
> period is the size of disks we had back then - they were tiny and often
> a minimal / w
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:39 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Sunday, December 16, 2012 01:52:46 PM Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> Am Samstag, 15. Dezember 2012, 20:57:24 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>> > Even on a system with only 2 sockets, it can be useful to have NUMA
>> > available.
>>
>> or not, becau
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 01:52:46 PM Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am Samstag, 15. Dezember 2012, 20:57:24 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > Even on a system with only 2 sockets, it can be useful to have NUMA
> > available.
>
> or not, because it costs you performance.
When does it cost performance?
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:16:05 +0200
nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
> On 2012-12-14, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > I guess the other question that's lurking here for me is why do you
> > have /usr on a separate partition? What's the usage model that
> > drives a person to do that? The most
Am Samstag, 15. Dezember 2012, 20:57:24 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> On Saturday, December 15, 2012 11:46:36 AM Grant wrote:
> > > You have to buy NUMA hardware. If the hardware you buys does not scream
> >
> > NUMA
> >
> > > at you, you don't have it. It is really that simple.
> > >
> > > Multicore,
Am Samstag, 15. Dezember 2012, 17:43:05 schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:18:25 +0100
>
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > It should be moving in the other direction for stability reasons and
> > > busybox is no full answer.
> > >
> > > On OpenBSD which has the benefit of userlan
On Dec 16, 2012 2:44 AM, "Jarry" wrote:
>
> Hi Gentoo-users, I have strange problem:
>
> "Something" is renaming /var/run/teamspeak3-server into
> /var/run/teamspeak3 in every reboot! Maybe it has something
> to do with udev/openrc/baselayout2, I do not know.
> This is what happens:
>
> I installe
On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:59:52 PM Paul Hartman wrote:
> For some reason, when I mount floppy disk (standard HD 3.5" VFAT disk)
> it does nothing. No error, just nothing... I have not tried this in
> well over a year, but it used to work.
>
> The /dev/fd0 device works normally, I can access
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 09:56:45AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> > I'll probably be going with SNA. Does anybody else have any experience
> > and/or opinions?
>
> I have no idea about performance but I've got udev and sna enabled
> at this tim
35 matches
Mail list logo
