Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge latest in a certain version series of a package

2014-01-30 Thread Thanasis
on 01/30/2014 08:30 AM Mick wrote the following: On Wednesday 29 Jan 2014 19:37:39 Thanasis wrote: Sometimes folks have to stay with a kernel series, because a vendor binary patch forces them into this situation. That's my case, ie Nvidia drivers for a relatively old hardware (AGP Graphics).

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge latest in a certain version series of a package

2014-01-30 Thread Thanasis
on 01/30/2014 12:50 AM Alan McKinnon wrote the following: On 30/01/2014 00:14, Thanasis wrote: Yea, but I think, this is the case for *all* packages, not only kernel sources, at least until now, isn't it? No, not at all. Kernels are different and portage treats them very differently.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge latest in a certain version series of a package

2014-01-30 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 30/01/2014 11:54, Thanasis wrote: on 01/30/2014 12:50 AM Alan McKinnon wrote the following: On 30/01/2014 00:14, Thanasis wrote: Yea, but I think, this is the case for *all* packages, not only kernel sources, at least until now, isn't it? No, not at all. Kernels are different and

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge latest in a certain version series of a package

2014-01-30 Thread James
Thanasis thanasis at asyr.hopto.org writes: That's my case, ie Nvidia drivers for a relatively old hardware (AGP Graphics). Nothing special. I am merely a home user, maintaining a few PCs. That's all. Nividia is a *VENDOR* that chooses not to provide information so drivers can be properly

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge latest in a certain version series of a package

2014-01-30 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 30/01/2014 17:25, James wrote: As part of the open source community, I would think you have a repsonsibility to *reward those vendors that work generously with the greater open source community* ? No, not actually. The only responsibility he has is to do whatever he feels like doing. It

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge latest in a certain version series of a package

2014-01-30 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Thursday 30 Jan 2014 15:25:47 James wrote: Nividia is a *VENDOR* that chooses not to provide information so drivers can be properly maintained, historically. ATI (AMD now) is a vendor who provides information so drivers can be maintained, even optimized, into perpetuity. Maybe you chose

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage performance dropped considerably

2014-01-30 Thread Stroller
On 30 Jan 2014, at 03:50 am, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: I just tried paludis again (after some time). ... * you cannot unmask USE flags at all, not without hackery... and that is really non-trivial for unmasking abi_x86_32 globally, because those masks are scattered across a lot of

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge latest in a certain version series of a package

2014-01-30 Thread James
Peter Humphrey peter at prh.myzen.co.uk writes: Maybe you chose unwisely?(get ATI next time) unless I've used nVidia cards for many years. When I bought my first one (maybe 20 years ago) ATI support in Linux was woeful, and the doggerel had it that the hardware was less

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge latest in a certain version series of a package

2014-01-30 Thread Thanasis
on 01/30/2014 11:04 PM James wrote the following: Peter Humphrey peter at prh.myzen.co.uk writes: Maybe you chose unwisely?(get ATI next time) unless I've used nVidia cards for many years. When I bought my first one (maybe 20 years ago) ATI support in Linux was woeful, and

[gentoo-user] media-libs/lilv-0.18.0 failed to compile

2014-01-30 Thread meino . cramer
Hi, On AMD64, recent Gentoo Linux, the library media-libs/lilv-0.18.0 failed to compile: * ERROR: media-libs/lilv-0.18.0::gentoo failed (configure phase): * configure failed * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_configure * environment, line 2131: Called