On Monday 24 Mar 2014 23:23:08 Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:44:23 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 24 Mar 2014 21:28:56 Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 +, Mick wrote:
I have been chasing my tail with ruby tonight.
The masking of ruby18 meant that I had to unmerge a lot of ruby packages
and then portage chose what to merge afresh.
unmerge or depclean? unmerge is less safe and may leave your system in a
bad
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
This is confusing.
Thanks. I'll post when I get to test some more.
Sure, I'll be curious how/what the resolution is to the
usb disappearing.
Do check your usb rules (udev? systemd ? ) or where ever they
are defined; for how it is defined on the usb
On Tuesday 25 Mar 2014 06:31:51 Hans de Graaff wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 +, Mick wrote:
I have been chasing my tail with ruby tonight.
The masking of ruby18 meant that I had to unmerge a lot of ruby packages
and then portage chose what to merge afresh.
unmerge or
The 21/03/14, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:10:49 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
So let's get this straight. You want most everyone on this list to
change what they have to do to remove dups caused by you, instead of
you changing what you do to fix the problem?
The 21/03/14, Dale wrote:
Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:41:03 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI. Most people don't say anything, they just blacklist you. After
that, you don't exist to them.
Yes, that's up to those few; it could happen, but most respond
On Tue, March 25, 2014 16:35, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 21/03/14, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:10:49 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
So let's get this straight. You want most everyone on this list to
change what they have to do to remove dups caused by you, instead
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 20:56:26 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 17:17:19 »Q« wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:33:20 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 08 Mar 2014 20:22:12 »Q« wrote:
On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 08:23:21 +0100
On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 11:07:49 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mar 15, 2014, at 19:17, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:33:20 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 08 Mar 2014 20:22:12 »Q« wrote:
On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 08:23:21 +0100
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:37:20 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
Why should Gentoo have a default?
Defaults are always a good idea - as long as they are reasonable and
rational.
In that case, Gentoo is missing a lot of good
Howdy,
So I have these entries in my /etc/default/grub file:
GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=Gentoo
GRUB_DEFAULT=kernel-3.13.6-gentoo
GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT=3
GRUB_TIMEOUT=10
GRUB_GFXMODE=1024x768
I ran 'grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg'
after the last ebuild of 3.13.6-gentoo
/boot shows:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:01:47 +0100
Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
I happily use git for local repositories to track configs in /etc or
for example, /root/bin or /usr/local/bin (scripts ..)
There is also etckeeper, yes, useful as well.
But I would like to have some kind of
OK,
So I built this kernel twice, one with DRM * and once DRM [m]
In the /boot dir ; diff config-3.13.6-gentoo config-3.13.6B-gentoo
yeilds:
2256,2257c2256,2257
CONFIG_AGP=y
CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=y
---
CONFIG_AGP=m
CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=m
2264,2265c2264,2265
CONFIG_DRM=y
CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HELPER=y
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:42:07 + (UTC), James wrote:
So I have these entries in my /etc/default/grub file:
GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=Gentoo
GRUB_DEFAULT=kernel-3.13.6-gentoo
GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT=3
GRUB_TIMEOUT=10
GRUB_GFXMODE=1024x768
I ran 'grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg'
after the
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:48:29 + (UTC), James wrote:
So I built this kernel twice, one with DRM * and once DRM [m]
So when I boot the one with DRM_Radeon=m, I still get this error
message building the latest radeon driver:
* Checking for suitable kernel configuration options...
(red) *
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26/03/14 07:48, James wrote:
So I built this kernel twice, one with DRM * and once DRM [m]
Sure it can easily be related to my limited knowledge of grub2, but I did
boot the 3.13.6B version of the kernel where all is set as modules
On 25/03/2014 22:08, »Q« wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:37:20 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
Why should Gentoo have a default?
Defaults are always a good idea - as long as they are reasonable and
rational.
In that case,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:25:26 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/03/2014 22:08, »Q« wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:37:20 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
Why should Gentoo have a default?
Defaults
On 26/03/2014 01:34, »Q« wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:25:26 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/03/2014 22:08, »Q« wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:37:20 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
Why should Gentoo
19 matches
Mail list logo
