On Sat, 9 Aug 2014 16:23:30 +0300
Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 17:37:52 -0700
> Bryan Gardiner wrote:
>
> > Happy Friday gentoo-user,
> >
> > I'm setting up a chroot for doing some Haskell work. This chroot is
> > so that I can test my package against old versions of my
> >
On Sat, 9 Aug 2014 14:38:12 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 17:37:52 -0700, Bryan Gardiner wrote:
>
> > I'm setting up a chroot for doing some Haskell work. This chroot is
> > so that I can test my package against old versions of my
> > dependencies. I thought I would be okay w
Jc García gmail.com> writes:
> >
> Just dropping and idea for your ebuild, you might have this planned
> but anyway, I would put something like 'virtual/jdk:1.6' in RDEPEND,
> so if things work as they should(but that's not realistic), any of the
> java implementations in the tree would provide
2014-08-25 12:44 GMT-06:00 James :
> James tampabay.rr.com> writes:
>
>
>> For openjdk-6-jdk [1] I'm not sure what my options are as it (or a newer
>> version?) is required by mesos-0.19-1. I did see these in portage:
>
>> Some discussion and guidance would be keenly appreciated, as I'm not at all
Ivan Viso Altamirano gmail.com> writes:
>
> This has little to do with Gentoo , but still it is a interesting debate .
> You can compile a great sort of programing lenguages to llvm bytecode :
> C(++) , java , Objetive C(++) , C# , Haskell , Rust ... And a lot more .
> On the other side , you
Sorry , i accidentally send it . What i wanted to say is that , Theoretically
, you can :
1) Native compile statically typed non-native lenguages
2) Recompile binaries for another architecture and even plataforms .
3) Achive a .NET like CLI , but even better .
And , notice , that the LLVM garbage
This has little to do with Gentoo , but still it is a interesting debate .
You can compile a great sort of programing lenguages to llvm bytecode :
C(++) , java , Objetive C(++) , C# , Haskell , Rust ... And a lot more . On
the other side , you CAN'T compile , lenguages like python or perl .
The
>Folks,
It's and early hack but mesos-0.19.1.ebuild is compiling out of my
/usr/local/portage.
I've got to get a few things done before I can upload it somewhere
to an overlay; mostly reading up on just how (whichone) to upload to.
If anyone wants to build mesos from a hacked (EAPI=5) overla
James tampabay.rr.com> writes:
> For openjdk-6-jdk [1] I'm not sure what my options are as it (or a newer
> version?) is required by mesos-0.19-1. I did see these in portage:
> Some discussion and guidance would be keenly appreciated, as I'm not at all
> up on the current gentoo java issues.
On 25/08/2014 17:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2014 13:35:11 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 25/08/2014 12:17, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Well, it was simple. I just said "rc-update del mdraid boot" and all is
now
well. I'd better revisit the docs to see if they still give the same
advice.
On Monday 25 August 2014 13:35:11 Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 25/08/2014 12:17, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
>
>
> > Well, it was simple. I just said "rc-update del mdraid boot" and all is
> > now
> > well. I'd better revisit the docs to see if they still give the same
> > advice.
>
> Very interesting
Hello,
I working on a new version of the apache mesos (debelopment_overlay) ebuild.
Slowly, I'm putting together an ebuild (EAPI=5) for mesos on gentoo.
I'm assuming I can use maven-bin, since it does not seem be in a src-compile
version in the portage tree?
For openjdk-6-jdk [1] I'm not sure wh
Am 22.08.2014 um 02:05 schrieb Mike Edenfield:
> From: Volker Armin Hemmann [mailto:volkerar...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:41 PM
>
>> you said you used 6 different kernel versions - which one? Did you use
>> vanilla or gentoo sources? And... maybe config?
> I've used all g
behrouz khosravi:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
>
>> and now you know why you should have added --buildpkg to your default
>> emerge options.
>
> Yeah, I am happy that I did it. I really don't like to compile
> chromium or libreoffice again!
>
Those methods a
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:52 AM, behrouz khosravi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
>
>> and now you know why you should have added --buildpkg to your default
>> emerge options.
>
> Yeah, I am happy that I did it. I really don't like to compile
> chromium or
On 25/08/2014 12:17, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Well, it was simple. I just said "rc-update del mdraid boot" and all is now
well. I'd better revisit the docs to see if they still give the same advice.
-- Regards Peter
Very interesting indeed. I now wonder if this is a race condition
between the
On 25/08/2014 13:18, Kerin Millar wrote:
No, I get the same result. Just a red asterisk at the left end of the
line
after "Starting up RAID devices..."
It since dawned upon me that defining AUTO as such won't help because
you define the arrays explicitly. Can you try again with the mdraid
s
On 25/08/2014 10:22, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2014 19:22:40 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 24/08/2014 14:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
--->8
So I decided to clean up /etc/mdadm.conf by adding these lines:
DEVICE /dev/sda* /dev/sdb*
ARRAY /dev/md5 devices=/dev/sda5,/dev/sdb5
ARRAY /dev/md
From: Volker Armin Hemmann [mailto:volkerar...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:41 PM
> you said you used 6 different kernel versions - which one? Did you use
> vanilla or gentoo sources? And... maybe config?
I've used all gentoo-sources so far, but I can give vanilla a try. Acc
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> and now you know why you should have added --buildpkg to your default
> emerge options.
Yeah, I am happy that I did it. I really don't like to compile
chromium or libreoffice again!
On Monday 25 August 2014 10:22:31 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 24 August 2014 19:22:40 Kerin Millar wrote:
> > On 24/08/2014 14:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> --->8
>
> > > So I decided to clean up /etc/mdadm.conf by adding these lines:
> > >
> > > DEVICE /dev/sda* /dev/sdb*
> > > ARRAY /dev/md
On 25 August 2014 12:19:02 CEST, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>On 25/08/14 17:19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 25/08/2014 11:11, Dale wrote:
>>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 25/08/2014 08:17, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:58:36PM +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote:
>> Hi. I
On 25/08/14 17:19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/08/2014 11:11, Dale wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 25/08/2014 08:17, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:58:36PM +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote:
> Hi. I just accidentally removed the /usr folder!
> And I am sure
On Sunday 24 August 2014 19:22:40 Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 24/08/2014 14:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
--->8
> > So I decided to clean up /etc/mdadm.conf by adding these lines:
> >
> > DEVICE /dev/sda* /dev/sdb*
> > ARRAY /dev/md5 devices=/dev/sda5,/dev/sdb5
> > ARRAY /dev/md7 devices=/dev/sda7,/dev/s
On 25/08/2014 11:11, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 25/08/2014 08:17, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:58:36PM +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote:
Hi. I just accidentally removed the /usr folder!
And I am sure the /usr/bin and several other folders are gon
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/08/2014 08:17, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:58:36PM +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote:
>>> Hi. I just accidentally removed the /usr folder!
>>> And I am sure the /usr/bin and several other folders are gone!
>>> Should I go for a complete re-in
On 25/08/2014 08:17, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:58:36PM +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote:
>> Hi. I just accidentally removed the /usr folder!
>> And I am sure the /usr/bin and several other folders are gone!
>> Should I go for a complete re-install or there is any other
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 24/08/14 20:05, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Grant wrote:
>>>
>>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNEL=="enp3s0u1", NAME="net0"
>>
>> "enp3s0u1" isn't a kernel name; it's an "ID_NET_NAME_PATH" attribute.
>
> That's what came to
28 matches
Mail list logo
