Re: [gentoo-user] Binary package server questions

On Tuesday 21 Feb 2017 21:26:20 Walter Dnes wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:19:16PM +, Mick wrote > > > Perhaps I do not understand ... why should the chrooted system need > > to use different flags? > > See > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.4/gcc/i386-and-x86-64-Options.html#i >

Re: [gentoo-user] Binary package server questions

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:19:16PM +, Mick wrote > Perhaps I do not understand ... why should the chrooted system need > to use different flags? See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.4/gcc/i386-and-x86-64-Options.html#i386-and-x86-64-Options The desktop is "-march=ivybridge" and the

Re: [gentoo-user] Binary package server questions

On Tuesday 21 Feb 2017 16:31:31 Walter Dnes wrote: > To repeat, the basic question I'm asking is how do I set up a "dual > mode" in the chroot so that... > - when the chroot is updating *ITSELF* it builds stuff "-march=native" > and with its own CPU_FLAGS_X86, etc > - when the chroot is

Re: [gentoo-user] Binary package server questions

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:31:31 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: > To repeat, the basic question I'm asking is how do I set up a "dual > mode" in the chroot so that... > - when the chroot is updating *ITSELF* it builds stuff "-march=native" > and with its own CPU_FLAGS_X86, etc > - when the chroot is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Binary package server questions

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:50:41PM +, Grant Edwards wrote > On 2017-02-21, Mick wrote: > > You'll need to run in 32bit mode when chrooting of course: > > Why? > > Is this some odd restriction in portage? > > All of the normal development tools are quite capable

Re: [gentoo-user] Binary package server questions

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:02:24AM +, Mick wrote > You'll need to run in 32bit mode when chrooting of course: > > linux32 chroot /mnt/Atom_Build_env /bin/bash > source /etc/profile > export PS1="(Atom_Build) $PS1" I'm already doing something similar with a 32-bit CentOS 6 chroot on a

Re: [gentoo-user] puzzling behavior of USE flags with sys-apps/man-db

On February 20, 2017 1:29:20 PM GMT+01:00, Harry Putnam wrote: >Setup: VBox vm running gentoo(amd64) guest on a win-10 (64bit) host > Hardware: HP xw8600 - 2x Xeon CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz - 32 GB ram > >On first attempt at emerging sys-apps/man-db (in came up in a world >update

Re: [gentoo-user] puzzling behavior of USE flags with sys-apps/man-db

Hello, On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Harry Putnam wrote: >sys-app/man-db berkdb -gmdb This should be sys-apps/man-db berkdb -gdbm > # cat /etc/portage/package.use/gtk+ > xll-libs/gtk+ X This should be x11-libs/gtk+ X ex one one dash ... Not ex ell ell dash ... HTH, -dnh -- Time is an

[gentoo-user] Re: Binary package server questions

On 2017-02-21, Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 21 Feb 2017 00:22:51 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:34:47 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: >> > Reading https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Binary_package_guide still leaves >> > >> > me uncertain. I have an ancient 32-bit

Re: [gentoo-user] Binary package server questions

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 02:38:21 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: > > Oh, and you don't need a package server, just export PKGDIR via NFS > > and mount it on the netbook. > > I see nfs as being more complex with kernel settings required for > client and server, not to mention config files all over the

Re: [gentoo-user] Binary package server questions

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 06:02:24 +, Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 21 Feb 2017 00:22:51 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > If the chroot is identical to your netbooks's install in terms of > > *FLAGS, USE, @world etc, then yes. I used to do it this way when I > > had an Atom netbook. I even build for a low