When I did my usual update today firefox 52.4.0 failed to build.
There are thousands of compiler warnings in the build log, but the
only thing I can find that looks like an error is this:
/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ [...]
/var/tmp/portage/www-client/firefox-52.4.0/work/firefox-52.4.0esr/ff/g
I'm blessed with city operated fiber to premise gigabit ethernet, when they do
an install they check with a laptop with a gigabit usb3 adapter. it actually
got about 960Mb/s.
--
"Informed delivery" is just an excuse for the post office to compile data
basses for sale to marketing firms and tho
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:43:50 -0400
Andrey Moshbear wrote:
> Hi;
>
> texi2any fails with SIGABRT when compiling texinfo:
>
> emerge -1v =sys-apps/texinfo-6.5: http://dpaste.com/0XJMVRV
> emerge --info: http://dpaste.com/1DDRESJ
>
> What's the failure cause and appropriate solution or workaround?
On Sat, 07 Oct 2017 19:11:42 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > mdbox? Is this a single file per mail folder?
> >
> > It's multiple mails per file and multiple files per mailbox.
> >
> > > The main reason I switched to maildir several decades ago was
> > > precisely the issues (by design) mbox
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 07:06:24 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> btrfs isn't horrible, but it basically hasn't been optimized at all.
>> The developers are mainly focused on getting it to not destroy your
>> data, with mixed success. An obvious e
On Saturday, October 7, 2017 6:13:57 PM CEST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Oct 2017 14:59:39 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > Although, I will also be switching to dovecot's mdbox format when I
> > > set up my next server, so the issue of lots of small files won't be
> > > nearly as big.
> >
>
On Saturday, 7 October 2017 17:32:21 BST Raymond Jennings wrote:
> Due to the removal of qt4, all of its reverse dependencies are also going
> to be removed.
>
> This decision has already been made by the qt project and is not up for
> discussion.
>
> Furthermore, qt4 has a large number of securi
On Saturday, 7 October 2017 17:23:33 BST Hubert Hauser wrote:
> I am using Gentoo as Host OS for Docker containers.
> I have compiled
> kernel using instructions on page
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Docker#Kernel and I have installed Docker
> from Gentoo repository.
>
> Host system informations
Due to the removal of qt4, all of its reverse dependencies are also going
to be removed.
This decision has already been made by the qt project and is not up for
discussion.
Furthermore, qt4 has a large number of security bugs and it has also been
brought to my attention that it even fails to buil
I am using Gentoo as Host OS for Docker containers. I have compiled
kernel using instructions on page
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Docker#Kernel and I have installed Docker
from Gentoo repository.
Host system informations:
pecan@tux ~ $ uname -a
Linux tux 4.12.12-gentoo #8 SMP Sat Oct 7 1
On Sat, 07 Oct 2017 14:59:39 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Although, I will also be switching to dovecot's mdbox format when I
> > set up my next server, so the issue of lots of small files won't be
> > nearly as big.
>
> mdbox? Is this a single file per mail folder?
It's multiple mails per f
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 07:06:24 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> btrfs isn't horrible, but it basically hasn't been optimized at all.
> The developers are mainly focused on getting it to not destroy your
> data, with mixed success. An obvious example of this is that if you
> read a file from a pair of mi
On Saturday, October 7, 2017 11:28:08 AM CEST Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 10/6/2017, 2:12:00 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > I had a large partition with reiserfs.
> > Running fsck always failed due to running out of memory.
> >
> > Partition was quite a bit larger than 2TB (around 6TB) and contained
> > a
On Saturday, October 7, 2017 11:18:33 AM CEST Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 10/6/2017, 8:53:27 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
> > 171005 christos kotsis wrote:
> >> I just noticed that ReiserFS has significant performance
> >> over ext3, 4 when dealing with small files.
> >
> > I've long relied on ReiserFS for e
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 05:18:33 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> Anyone have any experience with comparing performance with either btrfs
>> or ZFS against either ReiserFS or XFS for a maildir based mail server?
>
> I tried btrfs on a mail server and i
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 05:18:33 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Anyone have any experience with comparing performance with either btrfs
> or ZFS against either ReiserFS or XFS for a maildir based mail server?
I tried btrfs on a mail server and it was unbearably slow. Disabling
copy-on-write made a big diff
I've installed Vagrant in Gentoo from repository. I'm using Ruby 2.2.8.
I've got following error when I was tried run Vagrant as non-root user:
pecan@tux ~ $ vagrant
/usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.2.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in
`require': cannot load such file -- checkpoint (Lo
On 10/07 08:19, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 00:41:26 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> > I dont want to convert the md-files to html, since I want to update
> > the repo later (see above).
> > The problem are files referencing other files. Reading the md-files
> > via vim (for exampl
On 10/6/2017, 2:12:00 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I had a large partition with reiserfs.
> Running fsck always failed due to running out of memory.
>
> Partition was quite a bit larger than 2TB (around 6TB) and contained
> a huge (millions) amount of files, > but having an fsck become
> impossible
On 10/6/2017, 8:53:27 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
> 171005 christos kotsis wrote:
>> I just noticed that ReiserFS has significant performance
>> over ext3, 4 when dealing with small files.
> I've long relied on ReiserFS for everything except /boot
> & have never had any problems with my files or driv
On 10/7/2017, 12:09:07 AM, Stroller wrote:
>
>> On 6 Oct 2017, at 15:31, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>
Second, do you have rc_sys defined, or are you using auto-detect (is it
just commented out)?
>>>
>>> Just commented out.
>>
>> This is the one I'm worried about - how to change it back if it to
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 00:41:26 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> I dont want to convert the md-files to html, since I want to update
> the repo later (see above).
> The problem are files referencing other files. Reading the md-files
> via vim (for example) would imply to grab all references by hand.
>
22 matches
Mail list logo