Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re[4]: Re: Portage, git and shallow cloning

2018-07-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 5:29 PM Martin Vaeth wrote: > > Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:34 AM Martin Vaeth wrote: > >> > >> Biggest issue is that git signature happens by the developer who > >> last commited which means that in practice you need dozens/hundreds > >> of keys. > >

[gentoo-user] Re: Re[4]: Re: Portage, git and shallow cloning

2018-07-07 Thread Martin Vaeth
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:51 AM Martin Vaeth wrote: >> Davyd McColl wrote: >> >> > I ask because prior to the GitHub incident, I didn't have signature >> > verification enabled >> >> Currently, it is not practical to change this, see my other posting. > > You clearly don't u

[gentoo-user] Re: Re[4]: Re: Portage, git and shallow cloning

2018-07-07 Thread Martin Vaeth
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:34 AM Martin Vaeth wrote: >> >> Biggest issue is that git signature happens by the developer who >> last commited which means that in practice you need dozens/hundreds >> of keys. > > This is untrue. [...] > It will, of course, not work on the regula

Re: [gentoo-user] PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET inconsistent?

2018-07-07 Thread Andreas Fink
On Sat, 7 Jul 2018 21:51:31 +0300 Franz Fellner wrote: > It's not automatically doing magic but using things specified in the > profile. In this case look at ${PORTDIR}/profile/base/package.use > Setting PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET (which is expanded to those USEFlags) in your > make.conf will shadow th

Re: [gentoo-user] PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET inconsistent?

2018-07-07 Thread Franz Fellner
It's not automatically doing magic but using things specified in the profile. In this case look at ${PORTDIR}/profile/base/package.use Setting PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET (which is expanded to those USEFlags) in your make.conf will shadow those from the profile and spit out an error. 2018-07-07 21:45 GMT

Re: [gentoo-user] PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET inconsistent?

2018-07-07 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
The package you're referring to have only support of python2 interpreters (python2_7 (CPython) and pypy (not the pypy3)). It seems, by default (if neither of PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET is set), portage tries to do the "magic" (well, in my opinion, it opposes to the Gentoo Philosophy, and it should th

[gentoo-user] PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET inconsistent?

2018-07-07 Thread Andreas Fink
Hello, I have a question considering PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET because it seems to behave inconsistently on my system and I cannot find any documentation about it, that would guide me in the right direction how to fix it. Running emerge --info I see the following (I'm on ~amd64): ... PYTHON_SINGLE_TARG

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re[4]: Re: Portage, git and shallow cloning

2018-07-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:34 AM Martin Vaeth wrote: > > Rich Freeman wrote: > > > > Biggest issue with git signature verification is that right now it > > will still do a full pull/checkout before verifying > > Biggest issue is that git signature happens by the developer who > last commited which

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re[4]: Re: Portage, git and shallow cloning

2018-07-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:51 AM Martin Vaeth wrote: > > Davyd McColl wrote: > > > I ask because prior to the GitHub incident, I didn't have signature > > verification enabled > > Currently, it is not practical to change this, see my other posting. > You clearly don't understand what it actually c