On 2020-03-05 21:01, n952162 wrote:
On 2020-03-05 18:26, Wols Lists wrote:
On 04/03/20 10:19, n952162 wrote:
Yes, everything mounts when I explicitly say swapon -a. No problems
in
/var/log/messages.
I wonder. Is mount order deterministic at boot? Is it possible that
you're trying to activate
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 2:28 PM Manuel McLure wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:09 AM Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-03-09, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> > Would that be the consensus of the group here?
>
> My understanding is that AMD is currently leading both in raw performance as
> well
On Monday, 9 March 2020 18:08:54 GMT Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2020-03-09, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Would that be the consensus of the group here?
>
> After decades of buying AMD, over the past 5 years or so all my
> machines gradually shifted to Intel.
>
> So you can probably bet _that's_ not
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:09 AM Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2020-03-09, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > Would that be the consensus of the group here?
>
>
>
My understanding is that AMD is currently leading both in raw performance
as well as bang-for-buck.
--
Manuel A. McLure WW1FA
On 2020-03-09, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Would that be the consensus of the group here?
After decades of buying AMD, over the past 5 years or so all my
machines gradually shifted to Intel.
So you can probably bet _that's_ not what you want...
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards
In light of recent news and the 2 threads here about AMD and Intel
vulnerabilities I of course would have my only Windows machine apparently
start to die. As it's quite old, circa 2006 or so, I'm forced to at least
consider purchasing something to replace it.
This machine has only been used over
Hello list,
I decided to have another go at fixing my nfs setup. The host 192.168.1.4
exports its portage directory to this host, 192.168.1.5. I used to use nfs-v3
for this, but it wasn't working right so I'm trying with v4.
The problem is that, every time I tell this machine to mount the remote
On 3/9/20 11:35 AM, Consus wrote:
>
> But maybe the person who maintains ebuild does not have enough time to
> ensure that all QA requirements are met. E.g. installing (willingly) an
> unstable package is not the same as installing a "stable" package that
> in fact is not.
>
No one even agrees
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 04:42:20PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 3/8/20 4:22 PM, Consus wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it somehow possible to install unstable packages on stable Gentoo
> > without manual unmasking? Say, package dev-util/perf does not have _any_
> > stable ebuild, so IMO there is
On 08/03/2020 16:29, Alan Grimes wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/03/2020 03:22, Alan Grimes wrote:
Cannot mix incompatible Qt library (version 0x50e00) with this library
(version 0x50e01)
RTFM when using Gentoo.
Which manual? I haven't changed my behavior regarding updating my system
10 matches
Mail list logo
