On 28/4/23 21:21, Michael wrote:
On Friday, 28 April 2023 13:54:37 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Friday, 28 April 2023 10:08:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
230428 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2023 13:23:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
I've built & tested the new machine I was planning
On 2023-04-28, jul...@jroy.ca wrote:
> What login manager and DE/WM are you using? If you're using a WM,
> it's your own reponsibility to setup dbus when starting your
> session. A DE will do this for you.
>
> Typically, you can start your WM using `dbus-run-session `, at
> least for Wayland.
On Fri, 2023-04-28 at 11:15 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> So basically this is just a hack-layer to get around the inherent
> fact
> that linux is garbage.
I don't think shitting on Linux will attract a lot of help on this
mailing list. Nevertheless...
> Dbus is in my runlevels and shows no
On 2023-04-28, Alan Grimes wrote:
> A decenently good OS would provide an IPC mechanism and little else. =|
> So basically this is just a hack-layer to get around the inherent fact
> that linux is garbage.
Then one might wonder why you don't stop using it.
--
Grant
It looks like chromium has no freakin idea how to use dbus...
A decenently good OS would provide an IPC mechanism and little else. =|
So basically this is just a hack-layer to get around the inherent fact
that linux is garbage.
Dbus is in my runlevels and shows no errors when I poke it with
On 27/04/2023 21:40, Alan Grimes wrote:
I rebuilt my system on gcc 13.1. I think the compiler is good but it
exposed some bugs in a handful of packages, these are:
Tracker bugs are always useful for knowing what will break before you
upgrade: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865117
On Friday, 28 April 2023 13:54:37 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday, 28 April 2023 10:08:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
> > 230428 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 27 April 2023 13:23:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
> > >> I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
> > >> & am at
On Friday, 28 April 2023 10:08:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
> 230428 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Thursday, 27 April 2023 13:23:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
> >> I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
> >> & am at the point of designing the partitions.
> >> For many years, I've used
230428 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 April 2023 13:23:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
>> I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
>> & am at the point of designing the partitions.
>> For many years, I've used Reiserfs, but it is now obsolescent,
>> so I need to choose an
On Thursday, 27 April 2023 13:23:01 BST Philip Webb wrote:
> I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
> & am at the point of designing the partitions.
>
> For many years, I've used Reiserfs, but it is now obsolescent,
> so I need to choose an alternative. Reiserfs seemed
On 27.04.23 14:23, Philip Webb wrote:
I've built & tested the new machine I was planning in 2022
& am at the point of designing the partitions.
For many years, I've used Reiserfs, but it is now obsolescent,
so I need to choose an alternative. Reiserfs seemed appropriate
for a system with a
11 matches
Mail list logo
