On 2024-04-16, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> Arve,
>
> On Tuesday, 2024-04-16 15:53:48 +0200, you wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Only LTS kernels get stabilised, so this information is readily available.
>
> I'm sure I don't understand this: According to "https://www.kernel.org/;
> kernel 6.6.27 is "longterm",
Arve,
On Tuesday, 2024-04-16 15:53:48 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> Only LTS kernels get stabilised, so this information is readily available.
I'm sure I don't understand this: According to "https://www.kernel.org/;
kernel 6.6.27 is "longterm", but according to "eix" the most recent
6.6.*
On April 16, 2024 10:44:55 AM EDT, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
>This is what I get after this morning's update:
>
>
>Dependency resolution took 16.03 s (backtrack: 0/20).
>
>[ebuild N ] gui-libs/gtk-4.12.5:4::gentoo USE="X cups gstreamer
>introspection wayland (-aqua) -broadway
On 2024-04-16, Dale wrote:
> I've never understood what is supported long term either. I use
> gentoo-sources. I've never figured out just how to pick a kernel that
> is supposed to be stable for the larger version. In other words, only
> security and bug fixes, no new hardware. Right now,
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2024-04-16, Arve Barsnes wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 15:29, Dr Rainer Woitok
>> wrote:
My understanding is the gentoo-sources kernels are aligned with the LTS
upstream releases.
>>> Right, they use the same version numbers. But you can't see from just
Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 15:29, Dr Rainer Woitok
> wrote:
>>> My understanding is the gentoo-sources kernels are aligned with the LTS
>>> upstream releases.
>> Right, they use the same version numbers. But you can't see from just
>> looking at the available
On 2024-04-16, Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 15:29, Dr Rainer Woitok
> wrote:
>> > My understanding is the gentoo-sources kernels are aligned with the LTS
>> > upstream releases.
>>
>> Right, they use the same version numbers. But you can't see from just
>> looking at the
(Rearranged in chronological order...)
On Tuesday, 16 April 2024 15:08:33 BST Waldo Lemmer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024, 15:43 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Monday, 15 April 2024 12:19:02 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
--->8
> > I'm still mystified by these Gentoo binary packages. I assume that
On 4/16/24 7:15 AM, Michael wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 April 2024 11:55:20 BST Dale wrote:
If you update often, it shouldn't take long answer the questions. If
you do like me and don't update often, it may take longer but no more
time than it would if you updated often and added all the time
If you add --ask --verbose, Portage should tell you why it's falling back
to the source package.
Does your emerge command include --getbinpkg, or -g?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024, 15:43 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday, 15 April 2024 12:19:02 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> Hello list,
>
> [Big snip]
>
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 15:43, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I'm still mystified by these Gentoo binary packages. I assume that they're
> generated using the default USE flags in the profile version (whence the need
> to
> specify it in gentoobinhost.conf).
>
> So why is portage not fetching webkit-gtk
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 15:29, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> > My understanding is the gentoo-sources kernels are aligned with the LTS
> > upstream releases.
>
> Right, they use the same version numbers. But you can't see from just
> looking at the available "gentoo-sources" which one is LTS and
On Monday, 15 April 2024 12:19:02 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
[Big snip]
I'm still mystified by these Gentoo binary packages. I assume that they're
generated using the default USE flags in the profile version (whence the need
to
specify it in gentoobinhost.conf).
So why is portage
Michael,
On Tuesday, 2024-04-16 11:15:07 +0100, you wrote:
> ...
> > But this brings up two related questions:
> >
> > 1. Why does Gentoo not somehow mark LTS kernels either in the version
> >number or in the slot name? This would make it easier to prevent the
> >installation of too
Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 April 2024 11:55:20 BST Dale wrote:
>
>> If you update often, it shouldn't take long answer the questions. If
>> you do like me and don't update often, it may take longer but no more
>> time than it would if you updated often and added all the time
>> together. As
On Tuesday, 16 April 2024 11:55:20 BST Dale wrote:
> If you update often, it shouldn't take long answer the questions. If
> you do like me and don't update often, it may take longer but no more
> time than it would if you updated often and added all the time
> together. As far as I know, if one
Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On Monday, 2024-04-15 12:48:34 +0100, you wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Why have you set your /boot to be mounted at boot?
> Well, I think, I then just followed the Gentoo Handbook. But I see your
> point of saving time which could be better used to successfully
On Tuesday, 16 April 2024 10:04:43 BST Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On Monday, 2024-04-15 12:48:34 +0100, you wrote:
> > ...
> > Why have you set your /boot to be mounted at boot?
>
> Well, I think, I then just followed the Gentoo Handbook. But I see your
> point of saving time which
Michael,
On Monday, 2024-04-15 12:48:34 +0100, you wrote:
> ...
> Why have you set your /boot to be mounted at boot?
Well, I think, I then just followed the Gentoo Handbook. But I see your
point of saving time which could be better used to successfully unmount
the "/home/" partition. I'll
19 matches
Mail list logo
