Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade

2011-11-25 Thread
于 2011年11月24日 15:34, justin 写道: On 24/11/11 06:27, Paul Hartman wrote: Hi, After emerging glibc-2.14.1 today, pam stopped working, which prevented KDE from working and some other things. I got this kind of message: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo wiping out Gtk 2 support from packages that support it?

2011-07-07 Thread
On 2011年07月08日 04:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 07/07/11 15:36, Alan McKinnon wrote: And what about gnome? Does that not impose a fantastic testing burden, alongside which gnome-mplayer is small in comparison? Yes, but the value of one's time isn't relative. If you'll allow me to make up

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo wiping out Gtk 2 support from packages that support it?

2011-07-06 Thread
Devs can do what ever they think are right. Don't argue with them unless you pay them. Want gtk2 support? Put your ebuild in your personal overlay. On 2011年07月07日 00:35, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Is there a secret plan in place to keep users from being able to use Gtk 2 in packages that support

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is Gentoo wiping out Gtk 2 support from packages that support it?

2011-07-06 Thread
On 2011年07月07日 10:45, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 07/07/2011 05:12 AM, 微菜 wrote: Devs can do what ever they think are right. Don't argue with them unless you pay them. Who died and made *them* kings? Here's what gentoo.org claims: They have commit rights, that's why they think

Re: [gentoo-user] Graphviz needs libjpeg.la

2011-06-12 Thread
于 2011年06月13日 00:43, Daniel D Jones 写道: media-gfx/graphviz-2.26.3-r2 fails to compile because: grep: /usr/lib/libjpeg.la: No such file or directory The file does not exist. /usr/lib has the following files: libjpeg.a libjpeg.so - libjpeg.so.8.0.2 libjpeg.so.62 libjpeg.so.8 -