Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Mozilla & Google behind the scenes payola

2005-08-11 Thread Paul M Foster
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:14:26PM -0400, John J. Foster wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 05:05:34PM -0400, Paul M Foster wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:52:10PM -0400, John J. Foster wrote: > > > > > http://www.scroogle.org/gscrape.html#ffox > > > > &g

Re: [gentoo-user] udev, /dev/svga and gnuplot

2005-08-11 Thread Paul M Foster
t solve the problem. So again, how do I create a _working_ link to /dev/svga? (Not MAKEDEV-- it doesn't know how to make this link.) Paul > > > On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 02:02 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote: > > Using gentoo 2005.0 and trying to install the latest gnuplot, the > &

Re: [gentoo-user] udev, /dev/svga and gnuplot

2005-08-11 Thread Paul M Foster
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:52:56PM +0800, W.Kenworthy wrote: > bunyip ccze-0.2.1 # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge svgalib -s > Searching... > [ Results for search key : svgalib ] > [ Applications found : 1 ] > > * media-libs/svgalib > Latest version available: 1.9.21 > Latest version

[gentoo-user] udev, /dev/svga and gnuplot

2005-08-11 Thread Paul M Foster
Using gentoo 2005.0 and trying to install the latest gnuplot, the compile fails, and appears to be looking for a /dev/svga link. I've updated udev and svgalib to the latest. There was supposedly a fixed bug, number 92158, which talks about this. The person who repaired the bug made a change to

[gentoo-user] udev, /dev/svga and gnuplot

2005-08-11 Thread Paul M Foster
Using gentoo 2005.0 and trying to install the latest gnuplot, the compile fails, and appears to be looking for a /dev/svga link. I've updated udev and svgalib to the latest. There was supposedly a fixed bug, number 92158, which talks about this. The person who repaired the bug made a change to

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Mozilla & Google behind the scenes payola

2005-08-09 Thread Paul M Foster
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:52:10PM -0400, John J. Foster wrote: > http://www.scroogle.org/gscrape.html#ffox > > Just wondering if anyone had heard of this. Although, if true, it > certainly doesn't surprise me with todays corporate ethics as they are. > Just a bad mark on Mozilla. > I'm trying

Re: [gentoo-user] NE module, modprobe, etc.

2005-08-07 Thread Paul M Foster
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:41:56AM +0800, W.Kenworthy wrote: > Experience across a number of cards on a number of machines (both > running 2.4 and early 2.6 kernels) says otherwise - and its not working > so its worth a try! In fact, I cant remember it ever working without > the irq option, even

Re: [gentoo-user] NE module, modprobe, etc.

2005-08-07 Thread Paul M Foster
index.php?title=ISA_Network_Cards > The IRQ is not needed on the ne driver unless you have more than one ne card in the machine. Paul > > On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 18:17 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote: > > I've got an older machine whose NIC uses the ne module. When I run > > ge

[gentoo-user] NE module, modprobe, etc.

2005-08-07 Thread Paul M Foster
I've got an older machine whose NIC uses the ne module. When I run generate-modprobe.conf, I get the following two lines (among others) in my modprobe.conf: alias ne off install eth0 /bin/true If I change the one line to: alias eth0 ne and add this line: options ne io=0x330 and remove the "

Re: [gentoo-user] Regetting Runlevel

2005-08-06 Thread Paul M Foster
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 10:27:15PM -0400, Heath E Miller wrote: > Ok strange one here , I got home tonight and somehow my ferrets got up > on the computer key board got logged in as su and managed to get into my > runlevel files and delete them. Not all but a good amount . Also in the > process co