Re: [gentoo-user] (OT) WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-05-01 Thread Robert G. Hays
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 02:56:36 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote: ah, glsa's makes a pretty good reason -- what I was referring to was the part about the portage stuff getting whanged; wasn't *even* referring to compile-time! Fair point. But if no one runs the bleeding edge

Re: [gentoo-user] (OT) WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-30 Thread Robert G. Hays
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 01:20:37 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote: 'll put it on the laptop when OOo finally finishes compiling, although r20 will probably be put by then... I'll say it again, *this* is why I only update when there is a *good* reason to. Are two GLSAs on

Re: [gentoo-user] (OT) WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-30 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 02:56:36 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote: Yah, glsa's makes a pretty good reason -- what I was referring to was the part about the portage stuff getting whanged; wasn't *even* referring to compile-time! Fair point. But if no one runs the bleeding edge stuff, it will never be