Re: [gentoo-user] /dev/hdb performance really sucks ...

2005-07-25 Thread Richard Fish
Richard Watson wrote: Hi - I'm getting vastly different performance results on hda (master) as opposed to hdb (slave). Basically when my root partition mounts (/dev/hdb) I'm warned that DMA is off, yet hdparm -i shows udma as active. Basically /dev/hdb performance sucks ... I've bought both driv

Re: [gentoo-user] /dev/hdb performance really sucks ...

2005-07-25 Thread Tomas Bohata
Richard Watson napsal(a): Hi - I'm getting vastly different performance results on hda (master) as opposed to hdb (slave). Basically when my root partition mounts (/dev/hdb) I'm warned that DMA is off, yet hdparm -i shows udma as active. Basically /dev/hdb performance sucks ... I've bought both d

[gentoo-user] /dev/hdb performance really sucks ...

2005-07-25 Thread Richard Watson
Hi - I'm getting vastly different performance results on hda (master) as opposed to hdb (slave). Basically when my root partition mounts (/dev/hdb) I'm warned that DMA is off, yet hdparm -i shows udma as active. Basically /dev/hdb performance sucks ... I've bought both drives in the last few months