On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 Feb 2016 19:08:42 Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>> > Well my concern was more that SGX would provide leverage for even more
>> >
On Wednesday 24 Feb 2016 19:08:42 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > Well my concern was more that SGX would provide leverage for even more
> > eavesdropping, rather than prohibit it.
>
> Yeah, I'm one of those persons who tends to
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>
> Well my concern was more that SGX would provide leverage for even more
> eavesdropping, rather than prohibit it.
>
Yeah, I'm one of those persons who tends to consider most fears of
TPMs and UEFI overblown, but these
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:28:03PM -0800, Max R.D. Parmer wrote:
> It seems like SGX is intertwined with the Intel Management Engine,
> Chapter 4 in Joanna Rutkowska's "Intel x86 considered harmful"[1] (pp.
> 35) goes in-depth on the potential issues with Intel ME.
>
> That same book has some
It seems like SGX is intertwined with the Intel Management Engine,
Chapter 4 in Joanna Rutkowska's "Intel x86 considered harmful"[1] (pp.
35) goes in-depth on the potential issues with Intel ME.
That same book has some light discussion on SGX (pp. 20) but it seems
like, if you are concerned about
Hello list
so I was about to treat myself to a new Thinkpad. After malware, backdoor
and BIOS rootkit stories at Lenovo’s (which to my knowledge were all
Windows-only problems) I already started looking elsewhere and even
considered bying a used model which existed before all this modern crap
6 matches
Mail list logo