Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Off site storage solution

2009-09-09 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:17:51 +0200 Momesso Andrea momesso.and...@gmail.com wrote: If I set up a script to keep in sync my local storage and the amazon one, the user will be able to reduce the costs (only download from amazon when really needed), and will not have to bother learning a new

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Off site storage solution

2009-09-09 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:12:27 +0200 Momesso Andrea momesso.and...@gmail.com wrote: Is anyone aware of a off site storage solution that could satisfay my needs? Aside from S3, there's also ADrive (adrive.com), which allows access via ftp and webdav and (unlike S3) doesn't charge for bandwidth.

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Off site storage solution

2009-09-09 Thread TopperH
Quoting Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:12:27 +0200 Momesso Andrea momesso.and...@gmail.com wrote: Is anyone aware of a off site storage solution that could satisfay my needs? Aside from S3, there's also ADrive (adrive.com), which allows access via ftp and webdav

[gentoo-user] [OT] Off site storage solution

2009-09-08 Thread Momesso Andrea
This is very OT, but maybe I can finde some suggestions here. I've got a gentoo server running on a VPS from linode http://www.linode.com/ . I'm using the basic plan (linode 360) and I'm happy with that. The plan gives me 16gb storage that is enough for the webserver to work and to store a lot

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Off site storage solution

2009-09-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:12:27 +0200, Momesso Andrea wrote: Is anyone aware of a off site storage solution that could satisfay my needs? Amazon's S3 service has proved reliable and economical for me. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Off site storage solution

2009-09-08 Thread Momesso Andrea
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:47:11AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:12:27 +0200, Momesso Andrea wrote: Is anyone aware of a off site storage solution that could satisfay my needs? Amazon's S3 service has proved reliable and economical for me. Looks very interesting...

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Off site storage solution

2009-09-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:13:42 +0200, Momesso Andrea wrote: Amazon's S3 service has proved reliable and economical for me. Looks very interesting... Does it also provide a way to mount it as a filesystem (for example via nfs), so that it becomes transparently part of my server? There's a

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Off site storage solution

2009-09-08 Thread Momesso Andrea
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:42:58PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:13:42 +0200, Momesso Andrea wrote: Amazon's S3 service has proved reliable and economical for me. Looks very interesting... Does it also provide a way to mount it as a filesystem (for example via