Hi All,
I have looked around and have found confusing info regarding which is a better
key cipher to use for ssh authentication. Some say that RSA is widely
considered more secure than DSA. Some say that it doesn't really matter, as
long as you use a large enough bits setting in creating
On Monday 09 October 2006 09:07, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] [OT] RSA Vs DSA keys for SSH authentication':
Some say that RSA is
widely considered more secure than DSA.
DSA is mathematically stronger than RSA. However, that doesn't mean much
since most attacks don't
On Monday 09 October 2006 22:48, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Monday 09 October 2006 09:07, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] [OT] RSA Vs DSA keys for SSH authentication':
Some say that RSA is
widely considered more secure than DSA.
DSA is mathematically stronger than
DSA is mathematically stronger than RSA. However, that doesn't mean much
since most attacks don't come from attacking the core of the algorithm
anyway.
Do you mean that an RSA key with twice the number of bits (e.g. 2048 or even
higher) is still weaker (i.e. easier to crack) than the DSA
On Monday 09 October 2006 17:51, Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re:
[gentoo-user] [OT] RSA Vs DSA keys for SSH authentication':
RSA has
the advantage of allowing longer key lengths
From what I understand, the DSA algorithm has no particular ties to the
1024-bit key length
5 matches
Mail list logo
