Mick wrote:
So there's nothing that I would need to do client wise to make my gentoo box
communicate 'better' with the server? This is almost a rhetorical question,
because I am not sure I can define 'better'. I just ask to see if there is
any setting client-wise that will improve compatibil
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:10:11 +0100
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So there's nothing that I would need to do client wise to make my
> gentoo box communicate 'better' with the server? This is almost a
> rhetorical question, because I am not sure I can define 'better'. I
> just ask to see if t
On Friday 20 April 2007 12:30, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:08:03 +0100 Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > What does this mean?
> >
> > " Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version
> > RomCliSecure_4.12 debug1: no match: RomCliSecure_4.12 "
>
> That's in
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:08:03 +0100 Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What does this mean?
>
> " Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version
> RomCliSecure_4.12 debug1: no match: RomCliSecure_4.12 "
That's in compat.c, l.58ff. (4.6pl1). There's a table with
server/application speci
Hi All,
I am logging on to a branded Cisco router and I get this as a response:
===
OpenSSH_4.5p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8d 28 Sep 2006
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: Connecting to [XX.XXX.XXX.XX] port 22.
debug1: Connection es
5 matches
Mail list logo
